Workplace health and gender among cotton workers in America and Britain, c.1880s–1940s

Janet Greenlees*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
329 Downloads (Pure)


This article clarifies the differences between occupational health and workplace health and reveals how the two overlap. It unravels a multi-layered narrative about cotton textile workers' understandings and experiences of ill-health at work in America and Britain, utilizing a combination of oral histories, government documents, company and union records, and the trade press. It aims to identify the multiple influences on contemporary debates about health at work. Contrary to current historiography, I argue that gender was only occasionally important to such discussions among workers, and that gender did not significantly influence their responses to unhealthy conditions. Workers' understandings of, and responses to, workplace hazards were individual and related to knowledge about risk, ill-health and socioeconomic factors. American and British workers' understandings of and responses to their working environment reveals more convergence than divergence, suggesting a universal human response to the health risks of work that is not significantly influenced by national or industrial constraints, or by gender.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)459-485
Number of pages27
JournalInternational Review of Social History
Issue number3
Early online date5 Dec 2016
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2016


  • gender
  • environment
  • health


Dive into the research topics of 'Workplace health and gender among cotton workers in America and Britain, c.1880s–1940s'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this