Who is left standing when the tide retreats? Negotiating hospital discharge and pathways of care for homeless people

Martin Whiteford, Glenn Simpson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: The critical potential of hospital discharge policies and practices to ameliorate the health and social care needs of homeless people has become the focus of considerable interest in England. Central to this rise in policy formation and practice development is an acute understanding of the multiple exclusions homeless people face in navigating public health and social care systems. In ways small and large this nascent landscape is serving to redefine and reshape hospital arrangements for homeless people, and opening-up new ways to deliver care across clinical, social and therapeutic boundaries. The purpose of this paper is to seek to add empirical vigour and theoretical rigour to this unfolding policy and practice terrain.
Design/methodology/approach: This paper draws on findings from a case study concerned with exploring and explaining how statutory and voluntary sector organisations use specialist hospital discharge policies and practices to coordinate pathways of care for homeless people.
Findings: This paper illustrates how people affected by homelessness and ill-health are routinely denied access to statutory housing support, social work assessments and district nursing provision through acts of institutional gatekeeping and professional abrogation.
Originality/value: This paper makes an important contribution to understandings of the connections between hospital discharge arrangements for homeless people and statutory housing, social work and district nursing provision.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)125-135
Number of pages11
JournalHousing, Care and Support
Volume18
Issue number3/4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 21 Dec 2015

Fingerprint

social work
nursing
housing
district
homelessness
health
exclusion
public health
methodology
Values

Keywords

  • homelessness
  • partnership working
  • social work
  • district nursing
  • hospital discharge
  • statutory housing

Cite this

Whiteford, Martin ; Simpson, Glenn. / Who is left standing when the tide retreats? Negotiating hospital discharge and pathways of care for homeless people. In: Housing, Care and Support. 2015 ; Vol. 18, No. 3/4. pp. 125-135.
@article{abfd611dc61541a6a32fe2543ec07eb3,
title = "Who is left standing when the tide retreats? Negotiating hospital discharge and pathways of care for homeless people",
abstract = "Purpose: The critical potential of hospital discharge policies and practices to ameliorate the health and social care needs of homeless people has become the focus of considerable interest in England. Central to this rise in policy formation and practice development is an acute understanding of the multiple exclusions homeless people face in navigating public health and social care systems. In ways small and large this nascent landscape is serving to redefine and reshape hospital arrangements for homeless people, and opening-up new ways to deliver care across clinical, social and therapeutic boundaries. The purpose of this paper is to seek to add empirical vigour and theoretical rigour to this unfolding policy and practice terrain.Design/methodology/approach: This paper draws on findings from a case study concerned with exploring and explaining how statutory and voluntary sector organisations use specialist hospital discharge policies and practices to coordinate pathways of care for homeless people.Findings: This paper illustrates how people affected by homelessness and ill-health are routinely denied access to statutory housing support, social work assessments and district nursing provision through acts of institutional gatekeeping and professional abrogation.Originality/value: This paper makes an important contribution to understandings of the connections between hospital discharge arrangements for homeless people and statutory housing, social work and district nursing provision.",
keywords = "homelessness, partnership working, social work, district nursing, hospital discharge, statutory housing",
author = "Martin Whiteford and Glenn Simpson",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1108/HCS-08-2015-0014",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "125--135",
number = "3/4",

}

Who is left standing when the tide retreats? Negotiating hospital discharge and pathways of care for homeless people. / Whiteford, Martin; Simpson, Glenn.

In: Housing, Care and Support, Vol. 18, No. 3/4, 21.12.2015, p. 125-135.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Who is left standing when the tide retreats? Negotiating hospital discharge and pathways of care for homeless people

AU - Whiteford, Martin

AU - Simpson, Glenn

PY - 2015/12/21

Y1 - 2015/12/21

N2 - Purpose: The critical potential of hospital discharge policies and practices to ameliorate the health and social care needs of homeless people has become the focus of considerable interest in England. Central to this rise in policy formation and practice development is an acute understanding of the multiple exclusions homeless people face in navigating public health and social care systems. In ways small and large this nascent landscape is serving to redefine and reshape hospital arrangements for homeless people, and opening-up new ways to deliver care across clinical, social and therapeutic boundaries. The purpose of this paper is to seek to add empirical vigour and theoretical rigour to this unfolding policy and practice terrain.Design/methodology/approach: This paper draws on findings from a case study concerned with exploring and explaining how statutory and voluntary sector organisations use specialist hospital discharge policies and practices to coordinate pathways of care for homeless people.Findings: This paper illustrates how people affected by homelessness and ill-health are routinely denied access to statutory housing support, social work assessments and district nursing provision through acts of institutional gatekeeping and professional abrogation.Originality/value: This paper makes an important contribution to understandings of the connections between hospital discharge arrangements for homeless people and statutory housing, social work and district nursing provision.

AB - Purpose: The critical potential of hospital discharge policies and practices to ameliorate the health and social care needs of homeless people has become the focus of considerable interest in England. Central to this rise in policy formation and practice development is an acute understanding of the multiple exclusions homeless people face in navigating public health and social care systems. In ways small and large this nascent landscape is serving to redefine and reshape hospital arrangements for homeless people, and opening-up new ways to deliver care across clinical, social and therapeutic boundaries. The purpose of this paper is to seek to add empirical vigour and theoretical rigour to this unfolding policy and practice terrain.Design/methodology/approach: This paper draws on findings from a case study concerned with exploring and explaining how statutory and voluntary sector organisations use specialist hospital discharge policies and practices to coordinate pathways of care for homeless people.Findings: This paper illustrates how people affected by homelessness and ill-health are routinely denied access to statutory housing support, social work assessments and district nursing provision through acts of institutional gatekeeping and professional abrogation.Originality/value: This paper makes an important contribution to understandings of the connections between hospital discharge arrangements for homeless people and statutory housing, social work and district nursing provision.

KW - homelessness

KW - partnership working

KW - social work

KW - district nursing

KW - hospital discharge

KW - statutory housing

U2 - 10.1108/HCS-08-2015-0014

DO - 10.1108/HCS-08-2015-0014

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 125

EP - 135

IS - 3/4

ER -