Which equalities matter?: the place of affective equality in egalitarian thinking

Kathleen Lynch, John Baker, Sara Cantillon, Judy Walsh

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)

Abstract

There is a deep ambivalence in Western society about caring and loving generally. This ambivalence has found expression in the academy in both liberal and radical egalitarian traditions, love and care have for the most part been treated as private matters, personal affairs, not subjects of sufficient political importance to be mainstreamed in theory or empirical investigations, while the subject of solidarity is given limited research attention. Sociological, economic, legal and political thought has focused on the public sphere, the outer spaces of life, indifferent to the fact that none of these can function without the care institutions of society. Within classical economics and sociology in particular there has been a core assumption that the prototypical human being is a self-sufficient rational economic man. There has been little serious account taken of the reality of dependency for all human beings, both in childhood and at times of illness and infirmity. That fact generates two very important forms of inequality: inequality in the degree to which people’s needs for love and care are satisfied, and inequality in the work that goes into satisfying them. These are the core of what we call ‘affective inequality’.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationAffective Equality: Love, Care and Injustice
EditorsK Lynch, J Baker, M Lyons, M Feeley, N Hanlon, M O'Brien, J Walsh, S Cantillon
Place of PublicationUK
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan
Pages12-34
Number of pages23
Edition1
ISBN (Electronic)9780230245082
ISBN (Print)9780230227194
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

equality
ambivalence
love
classical economics
outer space
human being
solidarity
academy
economics
sociology
illness
childhood
Society

Keywords

  • affective equality
  • egalitarian traditions
  • dependancy
  • welfare

Cite this

Lynch, K., Baker, J., Cantillon, S., & Walsh, J. (2009). Which equalities matter?: the place of affective equality in egalitarian thinking. In K. Lynch, J. Baker, M. Lyons, M. Feeley, N. Hanlon, M. O'Brien, J. Walsh, ... S. Cantillon (Eds.), Affective Equality: Love, Care and Injustice (1 ed., pp. 12-34). UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lynch, Kathleen ; Baker, John ; Cantillon, Sara ; Walsh, Judy. / Which equalities matter?: the place of affective equality in egalitarian thinking. Affective Equality: Love, Care and Injustice. editor / K Lynch ; J Baker ; M Lyons ; M Feeley ; N Hanlon ; M O'Brien ; J Walsh ; S Cantillon. 1. ed. UK : Palgrave Macmillan, 2009. pp. 12-34
@inbook{8fa938c83ac54ac79576262ed96a7321,
title = "Which equalities matter?: the place of affective equality in egalitarian thinking",
abstract = "There is a deep ambivalence in Western society about caring and loving generally. This ambivalence has found expression in the academy in both liberal and radical egalitarian traditions, love and care have for the most part been treated as private matters, personal affairs, not subjects of sufficient political importance to be mainstreamed in theory or empirical investigations, while the subject of solidarity is given limited research attention. Sociological, economic, legal and political thought has focused on the public sphere, the outer spaces of life, indifferent to the fact that none of these can function without the care institutions of society. Within classical economics and sociology in particular there has been a core assumption that the prototypical human being is a self-sufficient rational economic man. There has been little serious account taken of the reality of dependency for all human beings, both in childhood and at times of illness and infirmity. That fact generates two very important forms of inequality: inequality in the degree to which people’s needs for love and care are satisfied, and inequality in the work that goes into satisfying them. These are the core of what we call ‘affective inequality’.",
keywords = "affective equality, egalitarian traditions, dependancy, welfare",
author = "Kathleen Lynch and John Baker and Sara Cantillon and Judy Walsh",
year = "2009",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780230227194",
pages = "12--34",
editor = "K Lynch and J Baker and M Lyons and M Feeley and N Hanlon and M O'Brien and J Walsh and S Cantillon",
booktitle = "Affective Equality: Love, Care and Injustice",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan",
edition = "1",

}

Lynch, K, Baker, J, Cantillon, S & Walsh, J 2009, Which equalities matter?: the place of affective equality in egalitarian thinking. in K Lynch, J Baker, M Lyons, M Feeley, N Hanlon, M O'Brien, J Walsh & S Cantillon (eds), Affective Equality: Love, Care and Injustice. 1 edn, Palgrave Macmillan, UK, pp. 12-34.

Which equalities matter?: the place of affective equality in egalitarian thinking. / Lynch, Kathleen; Baker, John; Cantillon, Sara; Walsh, Judy.

Affective Equality: Love, Care and Injustice. ed. / K Lynch; J Baker; M Lyons; M Feeley; N Hanlon; M O'Brien; J Walsh; S Cantillon. 1. ed. UK : Palgrave Macmillan, 2009. p. 12-34.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)

TY - CHAP

T1 - Which equalities matter?: the place of affective equality in egalitarian thinking

AU - Lynch, Kathleen

AU - Baker, John

AU - Cantillon, Sara

AU - Walsh, Judy

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - There is a deep ambivalence in Western society about caring and loving generally. This ambivalence has found expression in the academy in both liberal and radical egalitarian traditions, love and care have for the most part been treated as private matters, personal affairs, not subjects of sufficient political importance to be mainstreamed in theory or empirical investigations, while the subject of solidarity is given limited research attention. Sociological, economic, legal and political thought has focused on the public sphere, the outer spaces of life, indifferent to the fact that none of these can function without the care institutions of society. Within classical economics and sociology in particular there has been a core assumption that the prototypical human being is a self-sufficient rational economic man. There has been little serious account taken of the reality of dependency for all human beings, both in childhood and at times of illness and infirmity. That fact generates two very important forms of inequality: inequality in the degree to which people’s needs for love and care are satisfied, and inequality in the work that goes into satisfying them. These are the core of what we call ‘affective inequality’.

AB - There is a deep ambivalence in Western society about caring and loving generally. This ambivalence has found expression in the academy in both liberal and radical egalitarian traditions, love and care have for the most part been treated as private matters, personal affairs, not subjects of sufficient political importance to be mainstreamed in theory or empirical investigations, while the subject of solidarity is given limited research attention. Sociological, economic, legal and political thought has focused on the public sphere, the outer spaces of life, indifferent to the fact that none of these can function without the care institutions of society. Within classical economics and sociology in particular there has been a core assumption that the prototypical human being is a self-sufficient rational economic man. There has been little serious account taken of the reality of dependency for all human beings, both in childhood and at times of illness and infirmity. That fact generates two very important forms of inequality: inequality in the degree to which people’s needs for love and care are satisfied, and inequality in the work that goes into satisfying them. These are the core of what we call ‘affective inequality’.

KW - affective equality

KW - egalitarian traditions

KW - dependancy

KW - welfare

M3 - Chapter (peer-reviewed)

SN - 9780230227194

SP - 12

EP - 34

BT - Affective Equality: Love, Care and Injustice

A2 - Lynch, K

A2 - Baker, J

A2 - Lyons, M

A2 - Feeley, M

A2 - Hanlon, N

A2 - O'Brien, M

A2 - Walsh, J

A2 - Cantillon, S

PB - Palgrave Macmillan

CY - UK

ER -

Lynch K, Baker J, Cantillon S, Walsh J. Which equalities matter?: the place of affective equality in egalitarian thinking. In Lynch K, Baker J, Lyons M, Feeley M, Hanlon N, O'Brien M, Walsh J, Cantillon S, editors, Affective Equality: Love, Care and Injustice. 1 ed. UK: Palgrave Macmillan. 2009. p. 12-34