What’s in it for us? consent, access, and the meaning of research in a qualitative longitudinal study

Rebecca Taylor, Malin Arvidson, Rob Macmillan, Andri Soteri-Proctor, Simon Teasdale

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)

    Abstract

    Recruiting third sector organizations (TSOs) to a qualitative longitudinal (QL) study turned out to be in some cases a time-consuming and challenging process, and in others a little too easy. The governance structures of the organizations approached were not always simple to navigate with some organizations in a state of flux. Stakeholders’ different understandings of the meaning of research created tensions around anonymity. Establishing meaningful consent was not a straightforward process: who has the authority to grant “organizational” consent? This chapter explores the process of gaining consent and access, and maintaining relationships with research participants in “Real Times”; a study of TSOs and activities over three years. By third sector we refer to a range of non-governmental organizations and activities, including voluntary organizations, community groups, and social enterprises. Whilst the study is concerned with UK-focused organizations the issues raised can be seen to have direct relevance to the NGO sector and NGO scholarship more generally. Drawing on researchers’ field notes on the recruitment process, and interviews with the research team a year into the project conducted by one member of the team, we unpack some of the practical and ethical challenges of undertaking QL research in organizations.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationMethodological Challenges and New Approaches to Research in International Development
    PublisherPalgrave Macmillan
    Pages38-58
    Number of pages21
    ISBN (Print)978-1-349-45127-2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Fingerprint

    longitudinal study
    non-governmental organization
    anonymity
    stakeholder
    governance
    interview
    community
    Group

    Keywords

    • consent
    • access
    • meaning of research
    • qualitative longitudinal study
    • third sector organisations

    Cite this

    Taylor, R., Arvidson, M., Macmillan, R., Soteri-Proctor, A., & Teasdale, S. (2014). What’s in it for us? consent, access, and the meaning of research in a qualitative longitudinal study. In Methodological Challenges and New Approaches to Research in International Development (pp. 38-58). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137293626_3
    Taylor, Rebecca ; Arvidson, Malin ; Macmillan, Rob ; Soteri-Proctor, Andri ; Teasdale, Simon. / What’s in it for us? consent, access, and the meaning of research in a qualitative longitudinal study. Methodological Challenges and New Approaches to Research in International Development. Palgrave Macmillan, 2014. pp. 38-58
    @inbook{2bc393e5a4874be5a7a607e9eacb7fcd,
    title = "What’s in it for us?: consent, access, and the meaning of research in a qualitative longitudinal study",
    abstract = "Recruiting third sector organizations (TSOs) to a qualitative longitudinal (QL) study turned out to be in some cases a time-consuming and challenging process, and in others a little too easy. The governance structures of the organizations approached were not always simple to navigate with some organizations in a state of flux. Stakeholders’ different understandings of the meaning of research created tensions around anonymity. Establishing meaningful consent was not a straightforward process: who has the authority to grant “organizational” consent? This chapter explores the process of gaining consent and access, and maintaining relationships with research participants in “Real Times”; a study of TSOs and activities over three years. By third sector we refer to a range of non-governmental organizations and activities, including voluntary organizations, community groups, and social enterprises. Whilst the study is concerned with UK-focused organizations the issues raised can be seen to have direct relevance to the NGO sector and NGO scholarship more generally. Drawing on researchers’ field notes on the recruitment process, and interviews with the research team a year into the project conducted by one member of the team, we unpack some of the practical and ethical challenges of undertaking QL research in organizations.",
    keywords = "consent, access, meaning of research, qualitative longitudinal study, third sector organisations",
    author = "Rebecca Taylor and Malin Arvidson and Rob Macmillan and Andri Soteri-Proctor and Simon Teasdale",
    note = "still in press checked 18-8-14 ET HH:14.12.15: not published yet: see url for working paper",
    year = "2014",
    doi = "10.1057/9781137293626_3",
    language = "English",
    isbn = "978-1-349-45127-2",
    pages = "38--58",
    booktitle = "Methodological Challenges and New Approaches to Research in International Development",
    publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan",

    }

    Taylor, R, Arvidson, M, Macmillan, R, Soteri-Proctor, A & Teasdale, S 2014, What’s in it for us? consent, access, and the meaning of research in a qualitative longitudinal study. in Methodological Challenges and New Approaches to Research in International Development. Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 38-58. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137293626_3

    What’s in it for us? consent, access, and the meaning of research in a qualitative longitudinal study. / Taylor, Rebecca; Arvidson, Malin; Macmillan, Rob; Soteri-Proctor, Andri; Teasdale, Simon.

    Methodological Challenges and New Approaches to Research in International Development. Palgrave Macmillan, 2014. p. 38-58.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)

    TY - CHAP

    T1 - What’s in it for us?

    T2 - consent, access, and the meaning of research in a qualitative longitudinal study

    AU - Taylor, Rebecca

    AU - Arvidson, Malin

    AU - Macmillan, Rob

    AU - Soteri-Proctor, Andri

    AU - Teasdale, Simon

    N1 - still in press checked 18-8-14 ET HH:14.12.15: not published yet: see url for working paper

    PY - 2014

    Y1 - 2014

    N2 - Recruiting third sector organizations (TSOs) to a qualitative longitudinal (QL) study turned out to be in some cases a time-consuming and challenging process, and in others a little too easy. The governance structures of the organizations approached were not always simple to navigate with some organizations in a state of flux. Stakeholders’ different understandings of the meaning of research created tensions around anonymity. Establishing meaningful consent was not a straightforward process: who has the authority to grant “organizational” consent? This chapter explores the process of gaining consent and access, and maintaining relationships with research participants in “Real Times”; a study of TSOs and activities over three years. By third sector we refer to a range of non-governmental organizations and activities, including voluntary organizations, community groups, and social enterprises. Whilst the study is concerned with UK-focused organizations the issues raised can be seen to have direct relevance to the NGO sector and NGO scholarship more generally. Drawing on researchers’ field notes on the recruitment process, and interviews with the research team a year into the project conducted by one member of the team, we unpack some of the practical and ethical challenges of undertaking QL research in organizations.

    AB - Recruiting third sector organizations (TSOs) to a qualitative longitudinal (QL) study turned out to be in some cases a time-consuming and challenging process, and in others a little too easy. The governance structures of the organizations approached were not always simple to navigate with some organizations in a state of flux. Stakeholders’ different understandings of the meaning of research created tensions around anonymity. Establishing meaningful consent was not a straightforward process: who has the authority to grant “organizational” consent? This chapter explores the process of gaining consent and access, and maintaining relationships with research participants in “Real Times”; a study of TSOs and activities over three years. By third sector we refer to a range of non-governmental organizations and activities, including voluntary organizations, community groups, and social enterprises. Whilst the study is concerned with UK-focused organizations the issues raised can be seen to have direct relevance to the NGO sector and NGO scholarship more generally. Drawing on researchers’ field notes on the recruitment process, and interviews with the research team a year into the project conducted by one member of the team, we unpack some of the practical and ethical challenges of undertaking QL research in organizations.

    KW - consent

    KW - access

    KW - meaning of research

    KW - qualitative longitudinal study

    KW - third sector organisations

    U2 - 10.1057/9781137293626_3

    DO - 10.1057/9781137293626_3

    M3 - Chapter (peer-reviewed)

    SN - 978-1-349-45127-2

    SP - 38

    EP - 58

    BT - Methodological Challenges and New Approaches to Research in International Development

    PB - Palgrave Macmillan

    ER -

    Taylor R, Arvidson M, Macmillan R, Soteri-Proctor A, Teasdale S. What’s in it for us? consent, access, and the meaning of research in a qualitative longitudinal study. In Methodological Challenges and New Approaches to Research in International Development. Palgrave Macmillan. 2014. p. 38-58 https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137293626_3