What supports and impedes evidence-based practice implementation? A survey of Australian social workers

Mel Gray, Elyssa Joy, Debbie Plath , Stephen A. Webb

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper reports on findings from a national survey (n = 364) of social workers' views on what impedes and supports evidence-based practice (EBP) implementation. In contrast to some prior research, support for EBP was found to be strong among the social workers surveyed. Open-ended responses, however, reflected some reservations about the formalisation, relevance, usability and applicability of EBP in social work. A range of barriers to EBP implementation for social workers were identified at individual and organisational levels, which is largely supportive of findings from prior research. An interesting distinction was discerned between those respondents who preferred to engage in the whole EBP process themselves (locating, appraising and applying research) and those who preferred to adopt practice guidelines based on appraisal of research evidence by other experts. This finding has implications for the way organisations and the social work profession approach the implementation of EBP.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)667-684
Number of pages18
JournalBritish Journal of Social Work
Volume45
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Oct 2013

Fingerprint

Evidence-Based Practice
social worker
evidence
Social Work
Research
social work
Practice Guidelines
formalization
Surveys and Questionnaires
Social Workers
Organizations
profession
expert

Keywords

  • evidence-based practice
  • implementation
  • social work
  • barriers
  • facilitators

Cite this

@article{57fdd6b87f964464bc13924a586c646a,
title = "What supports and impedes evidence-based practice implementation? A survey of Australian social workers",
abstract = "This paper reports on findings from a national survey (n = 364) of social workers' views on what impedes and supports evidence-based practice (EBP) implementation. In contrast to some prior research, support for EBP was found to be strong among the social workers surveyed. Open-ended responses, however, reflected some reservations about the formalisation, relevance, usability and applicability of EBP in social work. A range of barriers to EBP implementation for social workers were identified at individual and organisational levels, which is largely supportive of findings from prior research. An interesting distinction was discerned between those respondents who preferred to engage in the whole EBP process themselves (locating, appraising and applying research) and those who preferred to adopt practice guidelines based on appraisal of research evidence by other experts. This finding has implications for the way organisations and the social work profession approach the implementation of EBP.",
keywords = "evidence-based practice, implementation, social work, barriers, facilitators",
author = "Mel Gray and Elyssa Joy and Debbie Plath and Webb, {Stephen A.}",
year = "2013",
month = "10",
day = "18",
doi = "10.1093/bjsw/bct123",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "667--684",
journal = "British Journal of Social Work",
issn = "0045-3102",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

What supports and impedes evidence-based practice implementation? A survey of Australian social workers. / Gray, Mel; Joy, Elyssa; Plath , Debbie; Webb, Stephen A.

In: British Journal of Social Work, Vol. 45, No. 2, 18.10.2013, p. 667-684.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - What supports and impedes evidence-based practice implementation? A survey of Australian social workers

AU - Gray, Mel

AU - Joy, Elyssa

AU - Plath , Debbie

AU - Webb, Stephen A.

PY - 2013/10/18

Y1 - 2013/10/18

N2 - This paper reports on findings from a national survey (n = 364) of social workers' views on what impedes and supports evidence-based practice (EBP) implementation. In contrast to some prior research, support for EBP was found to be strong among the social workers surveyed. Open-ended responses, however, reflected some reservations about the formalisation, relevance, usability and applicability of EBP in social work. A range of barriers to EBP implementation for social workers were identified at individual and organisational levels, which is largely supportive of findings from prior research. An interesting distinction was discerned between those respondents who preferred to engage in the whole EBP process themselves (locating, appraising and applying research) and those who preferred to adopt practice guidelines based on appraisal of research evidence by other experts. This finding has implications for the way organisations and the social work profession approach the implementation of EBP.

AB - This paper reports on findings from a national survey (n = 364) of social workers' views on what impedes and supports evidence-based practice (EBP) implementation. In contrast to some prior research, support for EBP was found to be strong among the social workers surveyed. Open-ended responses, however, reflected some reservations about the formalisation, relevance, usability and applicability of EBP in social work. A range of barriers to EBP implementation for social workers were identified at individual and organisational levels, which is largely supportive of findings from prior research. An interesting distinction was discerned between those respondents who preferred to engage in the whole EBP process themselves (locating, appraising and applying research) and those who preferred to adopt practice guidelines based on appraisal of research evidence by other experts. This finding has implications for the way organisations and the social work profession approach the implementation of EBP.

KW - evidence-based practice

KW - implementation

KW - social work

KW - barriers

KW - facilitators

U2 - 10.1093/bjsw/bct123

DO - 10.1093/bjsw/bct123

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 667

EP - 684

JO - British Journal of Social Work

JF - British Journal of Social Work

SN - 0045-3102

IS - 2

ER -