What makes a key player in interorganizational social policy networks? The case of Uruguay

Olga Biosca Artinano, Pablo Galaso

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Networks of organizations involved in public policy implementation require strong interaction, concerted action and high degrees of collaboration to be effective. However, little is known about how different types of organizations involved in implementation of multi-sectoral social policies interact in these networks. In this article the relationship between organizational characteristics and network position is explored, as well as how the intensity of collaborations can also determine organizations’ involvement in networks. The nature of funding (public/private) and the remit of activity of organizations are found to determine their influence and importance in social policy networks. Furthermore, the network position of the organizations also depends on the level of intensity of their interactions. These results can guide public administrators when developing and promoting networks to involve a particular type of actor and also policymakers as to which types of ties are more aligned with the implementation of a particular policy.
Original languageEnglish
JournalInternational Journal of Public Administration
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Sep 2019

Fingerprint

Uruguay
concerted action
type of organization
policy implementation
interaction
Social Policy
Policy networks
Social policy
public policy
funding
Interaction

Keywords

  • policy networks
  • social network analysis
  • social policy
  • Uruguay
  • Latin America

Cite this

@article{e59fe351af3d4973b13ffee7eed17116,
title = "What makes a key player in interorganizational social policy networks? The case of Uruguay",
abstract = "Networks of organizations involved in public policy implementation require strong interaction, concerted action and high degrees of collaboration to be effective. However, little is known about how different types of organizations involved in implementation of multi-sectoral social policies interact in these networks. In this article the relationship between organizational characteristics and network position is explored, as well as how the intensity of collaborations can also determine organizations’ involvement in networks. The nature of funding (public/private) and the remit of activity of organizations are found to determine their influence and importance in social policy networks. Furthermore, the network position of the organizations also depends on the level of intensity of their interactions. These results can guide public administrators when developing and promoting networks to involve a particular type of actor and also policymakers as to which types of ties are more aligned with the implementation of a particular policy.",
keywords = "policy networks, social network analysis, social policy, Uruguay, Latin America",
author = "{Biosca Artinano}, Olga and Pablo Galaso",
note = "Acceptance requested ET 27/9/19 OA article",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1080/01900692.2019.1666407",
language = "English",
journal = "International Journal of Public Administration",
issn = "0190-0692",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis Group",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What makes a key player in interorganizational social policy networks? The case of Uruguay

AU - Biosca Artinano, Olga

AU - Galaso, Pablo

N1 - Acceptance requested ET 27/9/19 OA article

PY - 2019/9/20

Y1 - 2019/9/20

N2 - Networks of organizations involved in public policy implementation require strong interaction, concerted action and high degrees of collaboration to be effective. However, little is known about how different types of organizations involved in implementation of multi-sectoral social policies interact in these networks. In this article the relationship between organizational characteristics and network position is explored, as well as how the intensity of collaborations can also determine organizations’ involvement in networks. The nature of funding (public/private) and the remit of activity of organizations are found to determine their influence and importance in social policy networks. Furthermore, the network position of the organizations also depends on the level of intensity of their interactions. These results can guide public administrators when developing and promoting networks to involve a particular type of actor and also policymakers as to which types of ties are more aligned with the implementation of a particular policy.

AB - Networks of organizations involved in public policy implementation require strong interaction, concerted action and high degrees of collaboration to be effective. However, little is known about how different types of organizations involved in implementation of multi-sectoral social policies interact in these networks. In this article the relationship between organizational characteristics and network position is explored, as well as how the intensity of collaborations can also determine organizations’ involvement in networks. The nature of funding (public/private) and the remit of activity of organizations are found to determine their influence and importance in social policy networks. Furthermore, the network position of the organizations also depends on the level of intensity of their interactions. These results can guide public administrators when developing and promoting networks to involve a particular type of actor and also policymakers as to which types of ties are more aligned with the implementation of a particular policy.

KW - policy networks

KW - social network analysis

KW - social policy

KW - Uruguay

KW - Latin America

U2 - 10.1080/01900692.2019.1666407

DO - 10.1080/01900692.2019.1666407

M3 - Article

JO - International Journal of Public Administration

JF - International Journal of Public Administration

SN - 0190-0692

ER -