What does the latest research evidence mean for practitioners who work with gay and bisexual men engaging in chemsex?

Jamie Frankis, Dan Clutterbuck

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

Abstract

In this issue, Weatherburn et al and Pakianathan et al provide a combination of practical and empirical insights into ‘chemsex’. This is particularly relevant to clinicians working with gay and bisexual men who have sex with men (GBMSM). Here we outline further issues for practitioners working with GBMSM who engage in chemsex.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)153-154
Number of pages2
JournalSexually Transmitted Infections
Volume93
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Jan 2017

Fingerprint

Research
Sexual Minorities

Keywords

  • Chemsex
  • gay men
  • MSM
  • sexual health

Cite this

@article{0f4ee77fe6224322bd42e43e9657f98f,
title = "What does the latest research evidence mean for practitioners who work with gay and bisexual men engaging in chemsex?",
abstract = "In this issue, Weatherburn et al and Pakianathan et al provide a combination of practical and empirical insights into ‘chemsex’. This is particularly relevant to clinicians working with gay and bisexual men who have sex with men (GBMSM). Here we outline further issues for practitioners working with GBMSM who engage in chemsex.",
keywords = "Chemsex, gay men, MSM, sexual health",
author = "Jamie Frankis and Dan Clutterbuck",
note = "non-HEFCE (editorial) ET",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1136/sextrans-2016-052783",
language = "English",
volume = "93",
pages = "153--154",
journal = "Sexually Transmitted Infections",
issn = "1368-4973",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "3",

}

What does the latest research evidence mean for practitioners who work with gay and bisexual men engaging in chemsex? / Frankis, Jamie; Clutterbuck, Dan.

In: Sexually Transmitted Infections, Vol. 93, No. 3, 20.01.2017, p. 153-154.

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

TY - JOUR

T1 - What does the latest research evidence mean for practitioners who work with gay and bisexual men engaging in chemsex?

AU - Frankis, Jamie

AU - Clutterbuck, Dan

N1 - non-HEFCE (editorial) ET

PY - 2017/1/20

Y1 - 2017/1/20

N2 - In this issue, Weatherburn et al and Pakianathan et al provide a combination of practical and empirical insights into ‘chemsex’. This is particularly relevant to clinicians working with gay and bisexual men who have sex with men (GBMSM). Here we outline further issues for practitioners working with GBMSM who engage in chemsex.

AB - In this issue, Weatherburn et al and Pakianathan et al provide a combination of practical and empirical insights into ‘chemsex’. This is particularly relevant to clinicians working with gay and bisexual men who have sex with men (GBMSM). Here we outline further issues for practitioners working with GBMSM who engage in chemsex.

KW - Chemsex

KW - gay men

KW - MSM

KW - sexual health

U2 - 10.1136/sextrans-2016-052783

DO - 10.1136/sextrans-2016-052783

M3 - Editorial

VL - 93

SP - 153

EP - 154

JO - Sexually Transmitted Infections

JF - Sexually Transmitted Infections

SN - 1368-4973

IS - 3

ER -