Weighting and valuing quality adjusted life years: preliminary results from the social value of a QALY project

Rachel M. Baker, Ian Bateman, Cam Donaldson, Michael Jones-Lee, Emily Lancsar, Graham Loomes, Helen Mason, Maria Odejar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Since the inception of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) there have been questions about whether quality adjusted life years (QALYs) gained by different beneficiaries of health care should be weighted equally and the feasibility of estimating a monetary value of a QALY. The studies reported in this document, had three aims:
• to identify characteristics of beneficiaries of health care over which relative weights should be derived;
• to estimate relative weights to be attached to health gains according to characteristics of recipients of these gains; and
• to assess the feasibility of estimating a willingness-to-pay-based value of a QALY.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-162
Number of pages162
JournalHealth Technology Assessment
Volume14
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2010

Fingerprint

Social Values
Quality-Adjusted Life Years
Delivery of Health Care
Weights and Measures
National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
Health

Keywords

  • QALY
  • health care
  • health economics
  • quality adjusted life years

Cite this

Baker, Rachel M. ; Bateman, Ian ; Donaldson, Cam ; Jones-Lee, Michael ; Lancsar, Emily ; Loomes, Graham ; Mason, Helen ; Odejar, Maria. / Weighting and valuing quality adjusted life years: preliminary results from the social value of a QALY project. In: Health Technology Assessment. 2010 ; Vol. 14, No. 7. pp. 1-162.
@article{5d295f2ee8124a17952bb54d25f69ab3,
title = "Weighting and valuing quality adjusted life years: preliminary results from the social value of a QALY project",
abstract = "Since the inception of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) there have been questions about whether quality adjusted life years (QALYs) gained by different beneficiaries of health care should be weighted equally and the feasibility of estimating a monetary value of a QALY. The studies reported in this document, had three aims: • to identify characteristics of beneficiaries of health care over which relative weights should be derived; • to estimate relative weights to be attached to health gains according to characteristics of recipients of these gains; and • to assess the feasibility of estimating a willingness-to-pay-based value of a QALY.",
keywords = "QALY, health care, health economics, quality adjusted life years",
author = "Baker, {Rachel M.} and Ian Bateman and Cam Donaldson and Michael Jones-Lee and Emily Lancsar and Graham Loomes and Helen Mason and Maria Odejar",
note = "<p>Originally published in: Health Technology Assessment (2010), 14 (27).</p>",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
doi = "10.3310/hta14270",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "1--162",
journal = "Health Technology Assessment",
issn = "1366-5278",
number = "7",

}

Weighting and valuing quality adjusted life years: preliminary results from the social value of a QALY project. / Baker, Rachel M.; Bateman, Ian; Donaldson, Cam; Jones-Lee, Michael; Lancsar, Emily; Loomes, Graham; Mason, Helen; Odejar, Maria.

In: Health Technology Assessment, Vol. 14, No. 7, 01.2010, p. 1-162.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Weighting and valuing quality adjusted life years: preliminary results from the social value of a QALY project

AU - Baker, Rachel M.

AU - Bateman, Ian

AU - Donaldson, Cam

AU - Jones-Lee, Michael

AU - Lancsar, Emily

AU - Loomes, Graham

AU - Mason, Helen

AU - Odejar, Maria

N1 - <p>Originally published in: Health Technology Assessment (2010), 14 (27).</p>

PY - 2010/1

Y1 - 2010/1

N2 - Since the inception of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) there have been questions about whether quality adjusted life years (QALYs) gained by different beneficiaries of health care should be weighted equally and the feasibility of estimating a monetary value of a QALY. The studies reported in this document, had three aims: • to identify characteristics of beneficiaries of health care over which relative weights should be derived; • to estimate relative weights to be attached to health gains according to characteristics of recipients of these gains; and • to assess the feasibility of estimating a willingness-to-pay-based value of a QALY.

AB - Since the inception of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) there have been questions about whether quality adjusted life years (QALYs) gained by different beneficiaries of health care should be weighted equally and the feasibility of estimating a monetary value of a QALY. The studies reported in this document, had three aims: • to identify characteristics of beneficiaries of health care over which relative weights should be derived; • to estimate relative weights to be attached to health gains according to characteristics of recipients of these gains; and • to assess the feasibility of estimating a willingness-to-pay-based value of a QALY.

KW - QALY

KW - health care

KW - health economics

KW - quality adjusted life years

U2 - 10.3310/hta14270

DO - 10.3310/hta14270

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 1

EP - 162

JO - Health Technology Assessment

JF - Health Technology Assessment

SN - 1366-5278

IS - 7

ER -