'We had to do what we thought was right at the time': retrospective discourse on the 2009 H1N1 pandemic in the UK

Mark Davis, Paul Flowers, Niamh Stephenson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

For a few weeks in 2009, it was not certain if the world faced a lethal influenza pandemic. As it turned out, the H1N1 pandemic was less severe than anticipated, though the infection did affect groups not usually susceptible to influenza. The deep uncertainties of this pandemic moment were associated with immense practical, scientific and political challenges for public health agencies around the world. We examine these challenges by drawing on the sociology of uncertainty to analyse the accounts given by UK public health practitioners who managed local responses to the pandemic. We discuss the retrospective and mitigating ‘we had to do what we thought was right at the time’ used by interviewees to explain their experience of articulating plans for a severe pandemic influenza with one that turned out to be mild.
Original languageEnglish
JournalSociology of Health and Illness
Early online date20 Aug 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Pandemics
contagious disease
discourse
Human Influenza
public health
uncertainty
Uncertainty
Public Health
sociology
Sociology
time
experience
Group
Infection

Keywords

  • influenza
  • public health
  • discourse
  • H1N1
  • pandemic

Cite this

Davis, Mark ; Flowers, Paul ; Stephenson, Niamh. / 'We had to do what we thought was right at the time': retrospective discourse on the 2009 H1N1 pandemic in the UK. In: Sociology of Health and Illness. 2014.
@article{790d99cf3e184a50b2b66e47b27ce90c,
title = "'We had to do what we thought was right at the time': retrospective discourse on the 2009 H1N1 pandemic in the UK",
abstract = "For a few weeks in 2009, it was not certain if the world faced a lethal influenza pandemic. As it turned out, the H1N1 pandemic was less severe than anticipated, though the infection did affect groups not usually susceptible to influenza. The deep uncertainties of this pandemic moment were associated with immense practical, scientific and political challenges for public health agencies around the world. We examine these challenges by drawing on the sociology of uncertainty to analyse the accounts given by UK public health practitioners who managed local responses to the pandemic. We discuss the retrospective and mitigating ‘we had to do what we thought was right at the time’ used by interviewees to explain their experience of articulating plans for a severe pandemic influenza with one that turned out to be mild.",
keywords = "influenza, public health, discourse, H1N1, pandemic",
author = "Mark Davis and Paul Flowers and Niamh Stephenson",
note = "add print reference details when available ET 24-1-14",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1111/1467-9566.12056",
language = "English",

}

'We had to do what we thought was right at the time': retrospective discourse on the 2009 H1N1 pandemic in the UK. / Davis, Mark; Flowers, Paul; Stephenson, Niamh.

In: Sociology of Health and Illness, 2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - 'We had to do what we thought was right at the time': retrospective discourse on the 2009 H1N1 pandemic in the UK

AU - Davis, Mark

AU - Flowers, Paul

AU - Stephenson, Niamh

N1 - add print reference details when available ET 24-1-14

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - For a few weeks in 2009, it was not certain if the world faced a lethal influenza pandemic. As it turned out, the H1N1 pandemic was less severe than anticipated, though the infection did affect groups not usually susceptible to influenza. The deep uncertainties of this pandemic moment were associated with immense practical, scientific and political challenges for public health agencies around the world. We examine these challenges by drawing on the sociology of uncertainty to analyse the accounts given by UK public health practitioners who managed local responses to the pandemic. We discuss the retrospective and mitigating ‘we had to do what we thought was right at the time’ used by interviewees to explain their experience of articulating plans for a severe pandemic influenza with one that turned out to be mild.

AB - For a few weeks in 2009, it was not certain if the world faced a lethal influenza pandemic. As it turned out, the H1N1 pandemic was less severe than anticipated, though the infection did affect groups not usually susceptible to influenza. The deep uncertainties of this pandemic moment were associated with immense practical, scientific and political challenges for public health agencies around the world. We examine these challenges by drawing on the sociology of uncertainty to analyse the accounts given by UK public health practitioners who managed local responses to the pandemic. We discuss the retrospective and mitigating ‘we had to do what we thought was right at the time’ used by interviewees to explain their experience of articulating plans for a severe pandemic influenza with one that turned out to be mild.

KW - influenza

KW - public health

KW - discourse

KW - H1N1

KW - pandemic

U2 - 10.1111/1467-9566.12056

DO - 10.1111/1467-9566.12056

M3 - Article

ER -