Abstract
In this paper, we examine the apparent resistance of publics to messages
regarding pandemic influenza. The 2009 H1N1 pandemic was addressed
through media: governments used print, broadcast and digital media to
advise publics to enact hygiene practices and comply with social isolation;
news media took up the pandemic as a lead story. Publics, however, rated
the pandemic as not serious, even before it was widely known that it was
mild for most. This problem is presently constructed as complacency:
where individuals are seen to lack appropriate motivation to avoid risk. We
combine perspectives on media reflexivity on the part of audiences with
general public interviews and focus groups in Australia and the UK, to offer
an alternative explanation for complacency.
regarding pandemic influenza. The 2009 H1N1 pandemic was addressed
through media: governments used print, broadcast and digital media to
advise publics to enact hygiene practices and comply with social isolation;
news media took up the pandemic as a lead story. Publics, however, rated
the pandemic as not serious, even before it was widely known that it was
mild for most. This problem is presently constructed as complacency:
where individuals are seen to lack appropriate motivation to avoid risk. We
combine perspectives on media reflexivity on the part of audiences with
general public interviews and focus groups in Australia and the UK, to offer
an alternative explanation for complacency.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Sociological Inquiry |
Early online date | 26 Jul 2014 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2014 |
Keywords
- pandemics
- media
- fear society
- influenza
- epidemiology