Washout policies in long-term indwelling urinary catheterisation in adults: a short version Cochrane review

Lesley Sinclair; Suzanne Hagen; Stephen Cross

doi:10.1002/nau.21063

Washout policies in long-term indwelling urinary catheterisation in adults: a short version Cochrane review

Lesley Sinclair, Suzanne Hagen, Stephen Cross

SHLS School Office

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

People requiring long-term bladder draining with an indwelling catheter can
experience catheter blockage. Regimens involving different solutions can be used to wash out catheters with the aim of preventing blockage. Objectives were to determine if certain washout regimens (including no washout) are better than others in terms of effectiveness, acceptability, complications, quality of life and economics for the management of long-term indwelling urinary catheters in adults. We searched the Cochrane Incontinence Group Specialised Trials Register (searched 30 April 2009), MEDLINE (January 1966 to April 2009), MEDLINE In- Process (30 April 2009), EMBASE (January 1980 to April 2009) and CINAHL (December 1981 to April 2009). Additionally, we examined all reference lists of identified trials and contacted manufacturers and researchers in the field.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1208-1212
Number of pages	5
Journal	Neurourology and Urodynamics
Volume	30
Issue number	7
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.21063
Publication status	Published - Sep 2011

Keywords

incontinence
urinary catheterisation

Documents and Links

10.1002/nau.21063

Cite this

@article{d75ab966500546bdaa96049ff93bb7e2,

title = "Washout policies in long-term indwelling urinary catheterisation in adults: a short version Cochrane review",

abstract = "People requiring long-term bladder draining with an indwelling catheter can experience catheter blockage. Regimens involving different solutions can be used to wash out catheters with the aim of preventing blockage. Objectives were to determine if certain washout regimens (including no washout) are better than others in terms of effectiveness, acceptability, complications, quality of life and economics for the management of long-term indwelling urinary catheters in adults. We searched the Cochrane Incontinence Group Specialised Trials Register (searched 30 April 2009), MEDLINE (January 1966 to April 2009), MEDLINE In- Process (30 April 2009), EMBASE (January 1980 to April 2009) and CINAHL (December 1981 to April 2009). Additionally, we examined all reference lists of identified trials and contacted manufacturers and researchers in the field.",

keywords = "incontinence, urinary catheterisation",

author = "Lesley Sinclair and Suzanne Hagen and Stephen Cross",

note = "<p>Originally published in:Neurourology and Urodynamics (2011). This article is based on a Cochrane review (2010), Issue 3. Art. No.: CD004012, available from: <a href={"}http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/o/cochrane/clsysrev/articles/CD004012/frame.html{"}>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/o/cochrane/clsysrev/articles/CD004012/frame.html</a>).</p>",

year = "2011",

month = sep,

doi = "10.1002/nau.21063",

language = "English",

volume = "30",

pages = "1208--1212",

journal = "Neurourology and Urodynamics",

issn = "0733-2467",

publisher = "John Wiley & Sons ",

number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Washout policies in long-term indwelling urinary catheterisation in adults: a short version Cochrane review

AU - Sinclair, Lesley

AU - Hagen, Suzanne

AU - Cross, Stephen

N1 - <p>Originally published in:Neurourology and Urodynamics (2011). This article is based on a Cochrane review (2010), Issue 3. Art. No.: CD004012, available from: <a href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/o/cochrane/clsysrev/articles/CD004012/frame.html">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/o/cochrane/clsysrev/articles/CD004012/frame.html</a>).</p>

PY - 2011/9

Y1 - 2011/9

N2 - People requiring long-term bladder draining with an indwelling catheter can experience catheter blockage. Regimens involving different solutions can be used to wash out catheters with the aim of preventing blockage. Objectives were to determine if certain washout regimens (including no washout) are better than others in terms of effectiveness, acceptability, complications, quality of life and economics for the management of long-term indwelling urinary catheters in adults. We searched the Cochrane Incontinence Group Specialised Trials Register (searched 30 April 2009), MEDLINE (January 1966 to April 2009), MEDLINE In- Process (30 April 2009), EMBASE (January 1980 to April 2009) and CINAHL (December 1981 to April 2009). Additionally, we examined all reference lists of identified trials and contacted manufacturers and researchers in the field.

AB - People requiring long-term bladder draining with an indwelling catheter can experience catheter blockage. Regimens involving different solutions can be used to wash out catheters with the aim of preventing blockage. Objectives were to determine if certain washout regimens (including no washout) are better than others in terms of effectiveness, acceptability, complications, quality of life and economics for the management of long-term indwelling urinary catheters in adults. We searched the Cochrane Incontinence Group Specialised Trials Register (searched 30 April 2009), MEDLINE (January 1966 to April 2009), MEDLINE In- Process (30 April 2009), EMBASE (January 1980 to April 2009) and CINAHL (December 1981 to April 2009). Additionally, we examined all reference lists of identified trials and contacted manufacturers and researchers in the field.

KW - incontinence

KW - urinary catheterisation

U2 - 10.1002/nau.21063

DO - 10.1002/nau.21063

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 1208

EP - 1212

JO - Neurourology and Urodynamics

JF - Neurourology and Urodynamics

SN - 0733-2467

IS - 7

ER -

Washout policies in long-term indwelling urinary catheterisation in adults: a short version Cochrane review

Abstract

Keywords

Documents and Links

Fingerprint

Cite this