Valuing the benefits of publicly-provided health care: does 'ability to pay' preclude the use of 'willingness to pay'?

Cam Donaldson*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

78 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The case against the use of willingness to pay (WTP) methods to value the benefits of publicly-provided health care is often made on the basis that WTP is associated with ability to pay. In this paper, it is demonstrated that this argument is not so straightforward, depending on two criteria: (a) the association of people's preferences with ability to pay and (b) the disparities of WTP for given options within categories of ability to pay. A method of dealing with ability to pay, based on these criteria, is proposed and illustrated through the use of data from a case study.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)551-563
Number of pages13
JournalSocial Science and Medicine
Volume49
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 1999
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Distribution of income
  • Evaluation
  • Measuring benefits
  • Utility
  • Willingness to pay

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Valuing the benefits of publicly-provided health care: does 'ability to pay' preclude the use of 'willingness to pay'?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this