Valuing lives equally in a benefit-cost analysis of safety projects: a method to reconcile theory and practice

Rachel M. Baker, S. M. Chilton, M. W. Jones-Lee, H. R.T. Metcalf

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

A value of statistical life (VSL) is used in cost-benefit analysis (CBA) as a monetary measure of the benefits to people from small risk reductions that arise from safety projects. Despite its widespread use in a number of countries, the concept of a VSL remains controversial, not least because it implies acceptance of the underlying ethical assumptions of CBA together with the idea that ‘social welfare’ can be measured and aggregated in some manner. In addition, to comply with theory, variable VSLs for different groups within society would be advocated. However, without fail, empirically, it is the case that those countries that employ a willingness to pay based approach to cost-benefit analysis of a safety project appraisal tend to use a single value for that accident context that is independent of the per capita income level, or indeed other personal characteristics, of the sub-group in society to which the safety improvement will actually apply. This article presents a straightforward, but theoretically justified adaptation to the calculation of a VSL which allows empirical practice by policymakers i.e. the application of a “common” VSL for any particular hazard within a given society, to be compatible with a CBA decision making approach.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)813-816
Number of pages4
JournalSafety Science
Volume47
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2009

Fingerprint

Value of Life
Cost benefit analysis
cost-benefit analysis
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Safety
Social Welfare
willingness to pay
Risk Reduction Behavior
social welfare
Accidents
Decision Making
Hazards
accident
Group
acceptance
Decision making
decision making
income
Society
Values

Keywords

  • safety projects
  • benefit-coast analysis

Cite this

Baker, Rachel M. ; Chilton, S. M. ; Jones-Lee, M. W. ; Metcalf, H. R.T. / Valuing lives equally in a benefit-cost analysis of safety projects: a method to reconcile theory and practice. In: Safety Science. 2009 ; Vol. 47, No. 6. pp. 813-816.
@article{6e1c075905e84c7cab5e0aa1d07113ff,
title = "Valuing lives equally in a benefit-cost analysis of safety projects: a method to reconcile theory and practice",
abstract = "A value of statistical life (VSL) is used in cost-benefit analysis (CBA) as a monetary measure of the benefits to people from small risk reductions that arise from safety projects. Despite its widespread use in a number of countries, the concept of a VSL remains controversial, not least because it implies acceptance of the underlying ethical assumptions of CBA together with the idea that ‘social welfare’ can be measured and aggregated in some manner. In addition, to comply with theory, variable VSLs for different groups within society would be advocated. However, without fail, empirically, it is the case that those countries that employ a willingness to pay based approach to cost-benefit analysis of a safety project appraisal tend to use a single value for that accident context that is independent of the per capita income level, or indeed other personal characteristics, of the sub-group in society to which the safety improvement will actually apply. This article presents a straightforward, but theoretically justified adaptation to the calculation of a VSL which allows empirical practice by policymakers i.e. the application of a “common” VSL for any particular hazard within a given society, to be compatible with a CBA decision making approach.",
keywords = "safety projects, benefit-coast analysis",
author = "Baker, {Rachel M.} and Chilton, {S. M.} and Jones-Lee, {M. W.} and Metcalf, {H. R.T.}",
note = "<p>Originally published in: Safety Science (2009), 47 (6), pp.813-816. Available online from publisher's website: <a href={"}http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2008.10.009{"}>http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2008.10.009</a>. Copyright Elsevier, reproduced in accordance with publisher copyright policy.</p>",
year = "2009",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.ssci.2008.10.009",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "813--816",
journal = "Safety Science",
issn = "0925-7535",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "6",

}

Valuing lives equally in a benefit-cost analysis of safety projects: a method to reconcile theory and practice. / Baker, Rachel M.; Chilton, S. M.; Jones-Lee, M. W.; Metcalf, H. R.T.

In: Safety Science, Vol. 47, No. 6, 07.2009, p. 813-816.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Valuing lives equally in a benefit-cost analysis of safety projects: a method to reconcile theory and practice

AU - Baker, Rachel M.

AU - Chilton, S. M.

AU - Jones-Lee, M. W.

AU - Metcalf, H. R.T.

N1 - <p>Originally published in: Safety Science (2009), 47 (6), pp.813-816. Available online from publisher's website: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2008.10.009">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2008.10.009</a>. Copyright Elsevier, reproduced in accordance with publisher copyright policy.</p>

PY - 2009/7

Y1 - 2009/7

N2 - A value of statistical life (VSL) is used in cost-benefit analysis (CBA) as a monetary measure of the benefits to people from small risk reductions that arise from safety projects. Despite its widespread use in a number of countries, the concept of a VSL remains controversial, not least because it implies acceptance of the underlying ethical assumptions of CBA together with the idea that ‘social welfare’ can be measured and aggregated in some manner. In addition, to comply with theory, variable VSLs for different groups within society would be advocated. However, without fail, empirically, it is the case that those countries that employ a willingness to pay based approach to cost-benefit analysis of a safety project appraisal tend to use a single value for that accident context that is independent of the per capita income level, or indeed other personal characteristics, of the sub-group in society to which the safety improvement will actually apply. This article presents a straightforward, but theoretically justified adaptation to the calculation of a VSL which allows empirical practice by policymakers i.e. the application of a “common” VSL for any particular hazard within a given society, to be compatible with a CBA decision making approach.

AB - A value of statistical life (VSL) is used in cost-benefit analysis (CBA) as a monetary measure of the benefits to people from small risk reductions that arise from safety projects. Despite its widespread use in a number of countries, the concept of a VSL remains controversial, not least because it implies acceptance of the underlying ethical assumptions of CBA together with the idea that ‘social welfare’ can be measured and aggregated in some manner. In addition, to comply with theory, variable VSLs for different groups within society would be advocated. However, without fail, empirically, it is the case that those countries that employ a willingness to pay based approach to cost-benefit analysis of a safety project appraisal tend to use a single value for that accident context that is independent of the per capita income level, or indeed other personal characteristics, of the sub-group in society to which the safety improvement will actually apply. This article presents a straightforward, but theoretically justified adaptation to the calculation of a VSL which allows empirical practice by policymakers i.e. the application of a “common” VSL for any particular hazard within a given society, to be compatible with a CBA decision making approach.

KW - safety projects

KW - benefit-coast analysis

U2 - 10.1016/j.ssci.2008.10.009

DO - 10.1016/j.ssci.2008.10.009

M3 - Article

VL - 47

SP - 813

EP - 816

JO - Safety Science

JF - Safety Science

SN - 0925-7535

IS - 6

ER -