Uncovering the complexity of workplace wellbeing using a cross-case analysis approach

C. Pettinger, Katrina Bannigan, R. Nelder, K. Nnoaham

Research output: Other contribution

Abstract

Background: Workplace wellbeing has become an important public health priority, due to working days lost and the economic cost of ill-health. Evidence for effective workplace interventions, however, remains inconsistent. Plymouth City Council (Public Health) prioritised workplace wellbeing as the inaugural focus for their ten-year inequalities programme ‘Thrive Plymouth’. An evaluation was commissioned to appraise this as an exemplar to optimize workplace wellbeing – assessing organizational perspectives on, and employee engagement with, workplace wellbeing. Methods: A multiple case study approach involved documentary analysis (wellbeing documents); six employee focus groups (n=41) and manager interviews (n=4). Standardized questions considered: i. general wellbeing (in and outside work) ii. awareness of wellbeing campaigns iii. ‘Thrive Plymouth’ knowledge (deliberately delayed to eliminate bias). Six workplaces were purposively recruited but two withdrew. Case was analysed individually, using inductive content analysis, then cross-case analyses determined similarities and differences. Two researchers cross-checked thematic coding, for transparency. Results: Four cases were analysed: two large businesses and two third sector organisations. All had broad views of workplace wellbeing, including physical and mental health constructs. Reasoning for, and experience of wellbeing, varied between them and their employees. Barriers to engagement with campaigns (e.g. Thrive Plymouth) were identified as a balance between employer responsibility and employee agency, exacerbated by cultural requirements of an ageing workforce. Further themes affecting employees wellbeing in and outside of work, included; the nature of work, emotional labour, shift patterns and job (in)security. Conclusions: This study shows that wellbeing is important to employers and ‘Thrive Plymouth’ was affirmed as a potential catalyst for engagement in lifestyle change. Barriers were highlighted by employees, however, that require further investigation. Recommendations are made for future intervention design and evaluation to be cognisant of workplace wellbeing complexities and external socio-cultural realities. References: Nnoaham, K. (2014) Framework for addressing health inequalities (4-4-54) (Cabinet Report 11 November 2014) Plymouth: Plymouth City Council
Original languageEnglish
TypeProfessional publication
Media of outputPoster
PublisherUniversity of Plymouth
Number of pages1
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2017

Fingerprint

Workplace
Public Health
Health Priorities
Focus Groups
Health Care Costs
Life Style
Mental Health
Economics
Research Personnel
Organizations
Interviews
Health

Keywords

  • workplace wellbeing
  • public health
  • interventions
  • employee engagement

Cite this

Pettinger, C., Bannigan, K., Nelder, R., & Nnoaham, K. (2017, Sep). Uncovering the complexity of workplace wellbeing using a cross-case analysis approach. University of Plymouth.
Pettinger, C. ; Bannigan, Katrina ; Nelder, R. ; Nnoaham, K. / Uncovering the complexity of workplace wellbeing using a cross-case analysis approach. 2017. University of Plymouth. 1 p.
@misc{233803b89f03478a89227cdeb50fa0a2,
title = "Uncovering the complexity of workplace wellbeing using a cross-case analysis approach",
abstract = "Background: Workplace wellbeing has become an important public health priority, due to working days lost and the economic cost of ill-health. Evidence for effective workplace interventions, however, remains inconsistent. Plymouth City Council (Public Health) prioritised workplace wellbeing as the inaugural focus for their ten-year inequalities programme ‘Thrive Plymouth’. An evaluation was commissioned to appraise this as an exemplar to optimize workplace wellbeing – assessing organizational perspectives on, and employee engagement with, workplace wellbeing. Methods: A multiple case study approach involved documentary analysis (wellbeing documents); six employee focus groups (n=41) and manager interviews (n=4). Standardized questions considered: i. general wellbeing (in and outside work) ii. awareness of wellbeing campaigns iii. ‘Thrive Plymouth’ knowledge (deliberately delayed to eliminate bias). Six workplaces were purposively recruited but two withdrew. Case was analysed individually, using inductive content analysis, then cross-case analyses determined similarities and differences. Two researchers cross-checked thematic coding, for transparency. Results: Four cases were analysed: two large businesses and two third sector organisations. All had broad views of workplace wellbeing, including physical and mental health constructs. Reasoning for, and experience of wellbeing, varied between them and their employees. Barriers to engagement with campaigns (e.g. Thrive Plymouth) were identified as a balance between employer responsibility and employee agency, exacerbated by cultural requirements of an ageing workforce. Further themes affecting employees wellbeing in and outside of work, included; the nature of work, emotional labour, shift patterns and job (in)security. Conclusions: This study shows that wellbeing is important to employers and ‘Thrive Plymouth’ was affirmed as a potential catalyst for engagement in lifestyle change. Barriers were highlighted by employees, however, that require further investigation. Recommendations are made for future intervention design and evaluation to be cognisant of workplace wellbeing complexities and external socio-cultural realities. References: Nnoaham, K. (2014) Framework for addressing health inequalities (4-4-54) (Cabinet Report 11 November 2014) Plymouth: Plymouth City Council",
keywords = "workplace wellbeing, public health, interventions, employee engagement",
author = "C. Pettinger and Katrina Bannigan and R. Nelder and K. Nnoaham",
note = "See: https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/handle/10026.1/9987",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
language = "English",
publisher = "University of Plymouth",
type = "Other",

}

Pettinger, C, Bannigan, K, Nelder, R & Nnoaham, K 2017, Uncovering the complexity of workplace wellbeing using a cross-case analysis approach. University of Plymouth.

Uncovering the complexity of workplace wellbeing using a cross-case analysis approach. / Pettinger, C.; Bannigan, Katrina; Nelder, R.; Nnoaham, K.

1 p. University of Plymouth. 2017, Professional publication.

Research output: Other contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - Uncovering the complexity of workplace wellbeing using a cross-case analysis approach

AU - Pettinger, C.

AU - Bannigan, Katrina

AU - Nelder, R.

AU - Nnoaham, K.

N1 - See: https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/handle/10026.1/9987

PY - 2017/9

Y1 - 2017/9

N2 - Background: Workplace wellbeing has become an important public health priority, due to working days lost and the economic cost of ill-health. Evidence for effective workplace interventions, however, remains inconsistent. Plymouth City Council (Public Health) prioritised workplace wellbeing as the inaugural focus for their ten-year inequalities programme ‘Thrive Plymouth’. An evaluation was commissioned to appraise this as an exemplar to optimize workplace wellbeing – assessing organizational perspectives on, and employee engagement with, workplace wellbeing. Methods: A multiple case study approach involved documentary analysis (wellbeing documents); six employee focus groups (n=41) and manager interviews (n=4). Standardized questions considered: i. general wellbeing (in and outside work) ii. awareness of wellbeing campaigns iii. ‘Thrive Plymouth’ knowledge (deliberately delayed to eliminate bias). Six workplaces were purposively recruited but two withdrew. Case was analysed individually, using inductive content analysis, then cross-case analyses determined similarities and differences. Two researchers cross-checked thematic coding, for transparency. Results: Four cases were analysed: two large businesses and two third sector organisations. All had broad views of workplace wellbeing, including physical and mental health constructs. Reasoning for, and experience of wellbeing, varied between them and their employees. Barriers to engagement with campaigns (e.g. Thrive Plymouth) were identified as a balance between employer responsibility and employee agency, exacerbated by cultural requirements of an ageing workforce. Further themes affecting employees wellbeing in and outside of work, included; the nature of work, emotional labour, shift patterns and job (in)security. Conclusions: This study shows that wellbeing is important to employers and ‘Thrive Plymouth’ was affirmed as a potential catalyst for engagement in lifestyle change. Barriers were highlighted by employees, however, that require further investigation. Recommendations are made for future intervention design and evaluation to be cognisant of workplace wellbeing complexities and external socio-cultural realities. References: Nnoaham, K. (2014) Framework for addressing health inequalities (4-4-54) (Cabinet Report 11 November 2014) Plymouth: Plymouth City Council

AB - Background: Workplace wellbeing has become an important public health priority, due to working days lost and the economic cost of ill-health. Evidence for effective workplace interventions, however, remains inconsistent. Plymouth City Council (Public Health) prioritised workplace wellbeing as the inaugural focus for their ten-year inequalities programme ‘Thrive Plymouth’. An evaluation was commissioned to appraise this as an exemplar to optimize workplace wellbeing – assessing organizational perspectives on, and employee engagement with, workplace wellbeing. Methods: A multiple case study approach involved documentary analysis (wellbeing documents); six employee focus groups (n=41) and manager interviews (n=4). Standardized questions considered: i. general wellbeing (in and outside work) ii. awareness of wellbeing campaigns iii. ‘Thrive Plymouth’ knowledge (deliberately delayed to eliminate bias). Six workplaces were purposively recruited but two withdrew. Case was analysed individually, using inductive content analysis, then cross-case analyses determined similarities and differences. Two researchers cross-checked thematic coding, for transparency. Results: Four cases were analysed: two large businesses and two third sector organisations. All had broad views of workplace wellbeing, including physical and mental health constructs. Reasoning for, and experience of wellbeing, varied between them and their employees. Barriers to engagement with campaigns (e.g. Thrive Plymouth) were identified as a balance between employer responsibility and employee agency, exacerbated by cultural requirements of an ageing workforce. Further themes affecting employees wellbeing in and outside of work, included; the nature of work, emotional labour, shift patterns and job (in)security. Conclusions: This study shows that wellbeing is important to employers and ‘Thrive Plymouth’ was affirmed as a potential catalyst for engagement in lifestyle change. Barriers were highlighted by employees, however, that require further investigation. Recommendations are made for future intervention design and evaluation to be cognisant of workplace wellbeing complexities and external socio-cultural realities. References: Nnoaham, K. (2014) Framework for addressing health inequalities (4-4-54) (Cabinet Report 11 November 2014) Plymouth: Plymouth City Council

KW - workplace wellbeing

KW - public health

KW - interventions

KW - employee engagement

M3 - Other contribution

PB - University of Plymouth

ER -