‘Trying to pin down jelly’: exploring intuitive processes in quality assessment for meta-ethnography

Toyne Francine; Kate Seers; Nick Allcock; Michelle  Briggs; Eloise Carr; JoyAnn  Andrews; Karen Barker

doi:10.1186/1471-2288-13-46

‘Trying to pin down jelly’: exploring intuitive processes in quality assessment for meta-ethnography

Toyne Francine, Kate Seers, Nick Allcock, Michelle Briggs, Eloise Carr, JoyAnn Andrews, Karen Barker

Nursing

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Studies that systematically search for and synthesise qualitative research are becoming more evident in health care, and they can make an important contribution to patient care. However, there is still no agreement as to whether, or how we should appraise studies for inclusion. We aimed to explore the intuitive processes that determined the ‘quality’ of qualitative research for inclusion in qualitative research syntheses. We were particularly interested to explore the way that knowledge was constructed.

Original language	English
Journal	BMC Medical Research Methodology
Volume	13
Issue number	46
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-46
Publication status	Published - Mar 2013

Keywords

patient care
qualitative research

Documents and Links

10.1186/1471-2288-13-46

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of '‘Trying to pin down jelly’: exploring intuitive processes in quality assessment for meta-ethnography'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@article{fb0b8246becb4ee8b930dbfff9d86497,

title = "{\textquoteleft}Trying to pin down jelly{\textquoteright}: exploring intuitive processes in quality assessment for meta-ethnography",

abstract = "Studies that systematically search for and synthesise qualitative research are becoming more evident in health care, and they can make an important contribution to patient care. However, there is still no agreement as to whether, or how we should appraise studies for inclusion. We aimed to explore the intuitive processes that determined the {\textquoteleft}quality{\textquoteright} of qualitative research for inclusion in qualitative research syntheses. We were particularly interested to explore the way that knowledge was constructed.",

keywords = "patient care, qualitative research",

author = "Toyne Francine and Kate Seers and Nick Allcock and Michelle Briggs and Eloise Carr and JoyAnn Andrews and Karen Barker",

note = "open access article. ET 5-7-13",

year = "2013",

month = mar,

doi = "10.1186/1471-2288-13-46",

language = "English",

volume = "13",

journal = "BMC Medical Research Methodology",

issn = "1471-2288",

publisher = "BioMed Central",

number = "46",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - ‘Trying to pin down jelly’: exploring intuitive processes in quality assessment for meta-ethnography

AU - Francine, Toyne

AU - Seers, Kate

AU - Allcock, Nick

AU - Briggs, Michelle

AU - Carr, Eloise

AU - Andrews, JoyAnn

AU - Barker, Karen

N1 - open access article. ET 5-7-13

PY - 2013/3

Y1 - 2013/3

N2 - Studies that systematically search for and synthesise qualitative research are becoming more evident in health care, and they can make an important contribution to patient care. However, there is still no agreement as to whether, or how we should appraise studies for inclusion. We aimed to explore the intuitive processes that determined the ‘quality’ of qualitative research for inclusion in qualitative research syntheses. We were particularly interested to explore the way that knowledge was constructed.

AB - Studies that systematically search for and synthesise qualitative research are becoming more evident in health care, and they can make an important contribution to patient care. However, there is still no agreement as to whether, or how we should appraise studies for inclusion. We aimed to explore the intuitive processes that determined the ‘quality’ of qualitative research for inclusion in qualitative research syntheses. We were particularly interested to explore the way that knowledge was constructed.

KW - patient care

KW - qualitative research

U2 - 10.1186/1471-2288-13-46

DO - 10.1186/1471-2288-13-46

M3 - Article

VL - 13

JO - BMC Medical Research Methodology

JF - BMC Medical Research Methodology

SN - 1471-2288

IS - 46

ER -