To kill is not the same as to let die: a reply to Coggon

Hugh V. McLachlan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Coggon’s remarks on a previous paper on active and passive euthanasia elicit a clarification and an elaboration of the argument in support of the claim that there is a moral difference between killing and letting die. The relevant moral duties are different in nature, strength and content. Moreover, not all people who are involved in the relevant situations have the same moral duties. The particular case that is presented in support of the claim that to kill is not the same as to let die is based upon a rejection of consequentialism.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)456-458
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Medical Ethics
Volume35
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2009

Fingerprint

Moral Obligations
euthanasia
Passive Euthanasia
Active Euthanasia
Ethical Theory

Keywords

  • medical ethics
  • euthanasia

Cite this

McLachlan, Hugh V. / To kill is not the same as to let die: a reply to Coggon. In: Journal of Medical Ethics. 2009 ; Vol. 35, No. 7. pp. 456-458.
@article{e7b558f4c1e8497692669423e13b0cf2,
title = "To kill is not the same as to let die: a reply to Coggon",
abstract = "Coggon’s remarks on a previous paper on active and passive euthanasia elicit a clarification and an elaboration of the argument in support of the claim that there is a moral difference between killing and letting die. The relevant moral duties are different in nature, strength and content. Moreover, not all people who are involved in the relevant situations have the same moral duties. The particular case that is presented in support of the claim that to kill is not the same as to let die is based upon a rejection of consequentialism.",
keywords = "medical ethics, euthanasia",
author = "McLachlan, {Hugh V.}",
note = "<p>Originally published in: Journal of Medical Ethics (2009), 35 (7), pp.456-458.</p>",
year = "2009",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/jme.2008.027409",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "456--458",
journal = "Journal of Medical Ethics",
issn = "0306-6800",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "7",

}

To kill is not the same as to let die: a reply to Coggon. / McLachlan, Hugh V.

In: Journal of Medical Ethics, Vol. 35, No. 7, 01.07.2009, p. 456-458.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - To kill is not the same as to let die: a reply to Coggon

AU - McLachlan, Hugh V.

N1 - <p>Originally published in: Journal of Medical Ethics (2009), 35 (7), pp.456-458.</p>

PY - 2009/7/1

Y1 - 2009/7/1

N2 - Coggon’s remarks on a previous paper on active and passive euthanasia elicit a clarification and an elaboration of the argument in support of the claim that there is a moral difference between killing and letting die. The relevant moral duties are different in nature, strength and content. Moreover, not all people who are involved in the relevant situations have the same moral duties. The particular case that is presented in support of the claim that to kill is not the same as to let die is based upon a rejection of consequentialism.

AB - Coggon’s remarks on a previous paper on active and passive euthanasia elicit a clarification and an elaboration of the argument in support of the claim that there is a moral difference between killing and letting die. The relevant moral duties are different in nature, strength and content. Moreover, not all people who are involved in the relevant situations have the same moral duties. The particular case that is presented in support of the claim that to kill is not the same as to let die is based upon a rejection of consequentialism.

KW - medical ethics

KW - euthanasia

U2 - 10.1136/jme.2008.027409

DO - 10.1136/jme.2008.027409

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 456

EP - 458

JO - Journal of Medical Ethics

JF - Journal of Medical Ethics

SN - 0306-6800

IS - 7

ER -