To kill is not the same as to let die: a reply to Coggon

Hugh V. McLachlan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Coggon’s remarks on a previous paper on active and passive euthanasia elicit a clarification and an elaboration of the argument in support of the claim that there is a moral difference between killing and letting die. The relevant moral duties are different in nature, strength and content. Moreover, not all people who are involved in the relevant situations have the same moral duties. The particular case that is presented in support of the claim that to kill is not the same as to let die is based upon a rejection of consequentialism.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)456-458
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Medical Ethics
Volume35
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2009

Keywords

  • medical ethics
  • euthanasia

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'To kill is not the same as to let die: a reply to Coggon'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this