The transaction “x-ray”: refreshing the parts other peers cannot reach!

Alan Aitken, Robert Paton

    Research output: Contribution to journalMeeting abstract

    Abstract

    Penetrating potentially sensitive areas for interviewees and, subsequently, aggregating interview outputs in a manner that avoids the effects of decontextulisation and decomposition are issues commonly faced by qualitative researchers. This paper, whose title is unashamedly borrowed from a long-running UK beer advert, presents a research method that seeks to overcome these issues. Using a web-based contemporary update of Diary-Diary Interview techniques, the researchers were able to penetrate the commercial sensitivity associated with the longitudinal study of presales interactions between business-to-business (B2B) buyers and sellers. The research methodology develops well-established techniques associated with qualitative content analysis to examine individual interactions and subsequently utilises an innovative graphical method of aggregation to present a nuanced view of groups of transactions that share common characteristics. The resulting transaction “X-rays” are used to explore emergent themes by comparing and contrasting X-rays across data sets. Although developed within the specific context of B2B negotiation, the authors contend that the methodology has significant cross-discipline potential. Applications suited to the method may include any context in which researchers seek to develop a deeper and more complete understanding of the interviewee than can be achieved by comparable techniques. The methodology is particularly suited to situations in which interviewees, although happy to participate in the interview process, may not respond to direct questioning for reasons of personal sensitivity. In this regard, presenting aggregated results in the form of transaction “X-rays” further gives assurance of interviewee anonymity.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1
    Number of pages1
    JournalInternational Journal of Qualitative Methods
    Volume15
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 29 Feb 2016

    Fingerprint

    transaction
    methodology
    interview
    anonymity
    interaction
    aggregation
    research method
    longitudinal study
    content analysis
    Group

    Keywords

    • qualitative researchers
    • interview outputs
    • interview techniques
    • interviews

    Cite this

    @article{e5f4fde025514f909e4c2550216244cc,
    title = "The transaction “x-ray”: refreshing the parts other peers cannot reach!",
    abstract = "Penetrating potentially sensitive areas for interviewees and, subsequently, aggregating interview outputs in a manner that avoids the effects of decontextulisation and decomposition are issues commonly faced by qualitative researchers. This paper, whose title is unashamedly borrowed from a long-running UK beer advert, presents a research method that seeks to overcome these issues. Using a web-based contemporary update of Diary-Diary Interview techniques, the researchers were able to penetrate the commercial sensitivity associated with the longitudinal study of presales interactions between business-to-business (B2B) buyers and sellers. The research methodology develops well-established techniques associated with qualitative content analysis to examine individual interactions and subsequently utilises an innovative graphical method of aggregation to present a nuanced view of groups of transactions that share common characteristics. The resulting transaction “X-rays” are used to explore emergent themes by comparing and contrasting X-rays across data sets. Although developed within the specific context of B2B negotiation, the authors contend that the methodology has significant cross-discipline potential. Applications suited to the method may include any context in which researchers seek to develop a deeper and more complete understanding of the interviewee than can be achieved by comparable techniques. The methodology is particularly suited to situations in which interviewees, although happy to participate in the interview process, may not respond to direct questioning for reasons of personal sensitivity. In this regard, presenting aggregated results in the form of transaction “X-rays” further gives assurance of interviewee anonymity.",
    keywords = "qualitative researchers, interview outputs, interview techniques, interviews",
    author = "Alan Aitken and Robert Paton",
    note = "Changed template to meeting abstract (previous id 24698793 for conf. paper) - ET",
    year = "2016",
    month = "2",
    day = "29",
    doi = "10.1177/1609406916672113",
    language = "English",
    volume = "15",
    pages = "1",
    journal = "International Journal of Qualitative Methods",
    issn = "1609-4069",
    publisher = "SAGE Publications",
    number = "1",

    }

    The transaction “x-ray”: refreshing the parts other peers cannot reach! / Aitken, Alan; Paton, Robert.

    In: International Journal of Qualitative Methods, Vol. 15, No. 1, 29.02.2016, p. 1.

    Research output: Contribution to journalMeeting abstract

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The transaction “x-ray”: refreshing the parts other peers cannot reach!

    AU - Aitken, Alan

    AU - Paton, Robert

    N1 - Changed template to meeting abstract (previous id 24698793 for conf. paper) - ET

    PY - 2016/2/29

    Y1 - 2016/2/29

    N2 - Penetrating potentially sensitive areas for interviewees and, subsequently, aggregating interview outputs in a manner that avoids the effects of decontextulisation and decomposition are issues commonly faced by qualitative researchers. This paper, whose title is unashamedly borrowed from a long-running UK beer advert, presents a research method that seeks to overcome these issues. Using a web-based contemporary update of Diary-Diary Interview techniques, the researchers were able to penetrate the commercial sensitivity associated with the longitudinal study of presales interactions between business-to-business (B2B) buyers and sellers. The research methodology develops well-established techniques associated with qualitative content analysis to examine individual interactions and subsequently utilises an innovative graphical method of aggregation to present a nuanced view of groups of transactions that share common characteristics. The resulting transaction “X-rays” are used to explore emergent themes by comparing and contrasting X-rays across data sets. Although developed within the specific context of B2B negotiation, the authors contend that the methodology has significant cross-discipline potential. Applications suited to the method may include any context in which researchers seek to develop a deeper and more complete understanding of the interviewee than can be achieved by comparable techniques. The methodology is particularly suited to situations in which interviewees, although happy to participate in the interview process, may not respond to direct questioning for reasons of personal sensitivity. In this regard, presenting aggregated results in the form of transaction “X-rays” further gives assurance of interviewee anonymity.

    AB - Penetrating potentially sensitive areas for interviewees and, subsequently, aggregating interview outputs in a manner that avoids the effects of decontextulisation and decomposition are issues commonly faced by qualitative researchers. This paper, whose title is unashamedly borrowed from a long-running UK beer advert, presents a research method that seeks to overcome these issues. Using a web-based contemporary update of Diary-Diary Interview techniques, the researchers were able to penetrate the commercial sensitivity associated with the longitudinal study of presales interactions between business-to-business (B2B) buyers and sellers. The research methodology develops well-established techniques associated with qualitative content analysis to examine individual interactions and subsequently utilises an innovative graphical method of aggregation to present a nuanced view of groups of transactions that share common characteristics. The resulting transaction “X-rays” are used to explore emergent themes by comparing and contrasting X-rays across data sets. Although developed within the specific context of B2B negotiation, the authors contend that the methodology has significant cross-discipline potential. Applications suited to the method may include any context in which researchers seek to develop a deeper and more complete understanding of the interviewee than can be achieved by comparable techniques. The methodology is particularly suited to situations in which interviewees, although happy to participate in the interview process, may not respond to direct questioning for reasons of personal sensitivity. In this regard, presenting aggregated results in the form of transaction “X-rays” further gives assurance of interviewee anonymity.

    KW - qualitative researchers

    KW - interview outputs

    KW - interview techniques

    KW - interviews

    U2 - 10.1177/1609406916672113

    DO - 10.1177/1609406916672113

    M3 - Meeting abstract

    VL - 15

    SP - 1

    JO - International Journal of Qualitative Methods

    JF - International Journal of Qualitative Methods

    SN - 1609-4069

    IS - 1

    ER -