The role of self-esteem and locus-of-control in determining confession outcomes

Melanie Dawn Douglass, Stella A. Bain, David J. Cooke, Paul McCarthy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Previous research suggests that self-esteem and locus-of-control are inversely related to compliance. There is also research to suggest that low self-esteem and external locus-of-control are associated with interrogative suggestibility. While it is believed that compliance and interrogative suggestibility are risk factors for falsely confessing, previous research has not directly examined the relationship between these personality variables and confession decisions made in an experimental paradigm where ground truth is known. The present study used the Russano paradigm and involved 104 participants recruited through the Glasgow Science Centre. Participants filled out personality questionnaires and a set of cognitive exercises with a confederate. As is standard for the paradigm, they were then accused of cheating. The researcher was not aware of whether participants were guilty or innocent. During the subsequent interview, which was based on conversation management, signed confession statements were sought, with these coded as true or false based on the participant’s condition. Results indicated that having an external locus-of-control was predictive of falsely confessing, rather than denying guilt. Self-esteem and time at which a confession was made did not affect the results. This paper discusses the implications of these findings and the study's limitations.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)292-296
Number of pages5
JournalPersonality and Individual Differences
Volume147
Early online date16 May 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2019

Fingerprint

Internal-External Control
Self Concept
Compliance
Personality
Research
Guilt
Research Personnel
Interviews

Keywords

  • self-esteem
  • locus-of-control
  • confessions
  • individual differences
  • Russano paradigm

Cite this

@article{37e45f66ef1c40818ef13f45f8618bb1,
title = "The role of self-esteem and locus-of-control in determining confession outcomes",
abstract = "Previous research suggests that self-esteem and locus-of-control are inversely related to compliance. There is also research to suggest that low self-esteem and external locus-of-control are associated with interrogative suggestibility. While it is believed that compliance and interrogative suggestibility are risk factors for falsely confessing, previous research has not directly examined the relationship between these personality variables and confession decisions made in an experimental paradigm where ground truth is known. The present study used the Russano paradigm and involved 104 participants recruited through the Glasgow Science Centre. Participants filled out personality questionnaires and a set of cognitive exercises with a confederate. As is standard for the paradigm, they were then accused of cheating. The researcher was not aware of whether participants were guilty or innocent. During the subsequent interview, which was based on conversation management, signed confession statements were sought, with these coded as true or false based on the participant’s condition. Results indicated that having an external locus-of-control was predictive of falsely confessing, rather than denying guilt. Self-esteem and time at which a confession was made did not affect the results. This paper discusses the implications of these findings and the study's limitations.",
keywords = "self-esteem, locus-of-control, confessions, individual differences, Russano paradigm",
author = "Douglass, {Melanie Dawn} and Bain, {Stella A.} and Cooke, {David J.} and Paul McCarthy",
note = "Acceptance in SAN AAM: 24m embargo",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.paid.2019.05.006",
language = "English",
volume = "147",
pages = "292--296",
journal = "Personality and Individual Differences",
issn = "0191-8869",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

}

The role of self-esteem and locus-of-control in determining confession outcomes. / Douglass, Melanie Dawn; Bain, Stella A.; Cooke, David J.; McCarthy, Paul.

In: Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 147, 01.09.2019, p. 292-296.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of self-esteem and locus-of-control in determining confession outcomes

AU - Douglass, Melanie Dawn

AU - Bain, Stella A.

AU - Cooke, David J.

AU - McCarthy, Paul

N1 - Acceptance in SAN AAM: 24m embargo

PY - 2019/9/1

Y1 - 2019/9/1

N2 - Previous research suggests that self-esteem and locus-of-control are inversely related to compliance. There is also research to suggest that low self-esteem and external locus-of-control are associated with interrogative suggestibility. While it is believed that compliance and interrogative suggestibility are risk factors for falsely confessing, previous research has not directly examined the relationship between these personality variables and confession decisions made in an experimental paradigm where ground truth is known. The present study used the Russano paradigm and involved 104 participants recruited through the Glasgow Science Centre. Participants filled out personality questionnaires and a set of cognitive exercises with a confederate. As is standard for the paradigm, they were then accused of cheating. The researcher was not aware of whether participants were guilty or innocent. During the subsequent interview, which was based on conversation management, signed confession statements were sought, with these coded as true or false based on the participant’s condition. Results indicated that having an external locus-of-control was predictive of falsely confessing, rather than denying guilt. Self-esteem and time at which a confession was made did not affect the results. This paper discusses the implications of these findings and the study's limitations.

AB - Previous research suggests that self-esteem and locus-of-control are inversely related to compliance. There is also research to suggest that low self-esteem and external locus-of-control are associated with interrogative suggestibility. While it is believed that compliance and interrogative suggestibility are risk factors for falsely confessing, previous research has not directly examined the relationship between these personality variables and confession decisions made in an experimental paradigm where ground truth is known. The present study used the Russano paradigm and involved 104 participants recruited through the Glasgow Science Centre. Participants filled out personality questionnaires and a set of cognitive exercises with a confederate. As is standard for the paradigm, they were then accused of cheating. The researcher was not aware of whether participants were guilty or innocent. During the subsequent interview, which was based on conversation management, signed confession statements were sought, with these coded as true or false based on the participant’s condition. Results indicated that having an external locus-of-control was predictive of falsely confessing, rather than denying guilt. Self-esteem and time at which a confession was made did not affect the results. This paper discusses the implications of these findings and the study's limitations.

KW - self-esteem

KW - locus-of-control

KW - confessions

KW - individual differences

KW - Russano paradigm

U2 - 10.1016/j.paid.2019.05.006

DO - 10.1016/j.paid.2019.05.006

M3 - Article

VL - 147

SP - 292

EP - 296

JO - Personality and Individual Differences

JF - Personality and Individual Differences

SN - 0191-8869

ER -