The role of impulse buying on fast fashion consumers’ emotions and behaviours

Nadia Weber, Elaine Ritch

Research output: Contribution to conferenceAbstractpeer-review

Abstract

Background scientific research: The popularity of fast-fashion has not diminished, despite allegations of exploiting workers and the environment (Environmental Audit Committee, 2021; Zhang, Zhang & Zhou, 2021). The model enables rapid mimicking of popular styles at low prices and has enabled consumers the opportunity to replace their wardrobe frequently (Watson & Yan, 2013). Coupled with online marketing tactics of limited sales incentives and product scarcity that provoke hedonism (Niinimäki et al., 2020), fast-fashion retailers encourage frequent impulsive consumption (Bick et al., 2018), which Lim et al. (2017) believes challenges consumers ability to resist making purchases. This situates low involvement with ‘throwaway fashion’, in which consumers continually buy new clothing, only to wear the items a handful of times before disposing of them (Zhang, Zhang & Zhou, 2021). Denisova (2021) suggests ‘throwaway fashion’ has stemmed from social media culture of never being photographed wearing an outfit more than once. While consumers have been found to purchase fashion more impulsively than from other product categories (Joung, 2014), Son & Lee (2019) found this was a means to improve negative emotions by triggering positive emotions. However, little is known about how consumers experience post-purchase impulsive fashion consumption, and whether they experience post-consumption regret. Chen, Chen & Lin (2020) characterise this as post-purchase cognitive dissonance in which consumers experience regret and disappointment from their behaviour. Previous research has found that fast-fashion consumers experience cognitive dissonance from not applying the same sustainable principles to their fashion practice that they do in other consumption and behavioural contexts (Cairns, Ritch & Bereziat, 2021; Stringer, Payne & Mortimer, 2021); however, those studies explored intention to purchase fashion rather than reflecting upon fashion consumption behaviours. Caught up in the excitement of marketing tactics and social media culture inspiring consumption, it may be upon reflection that discomfort emerges.

Research issue to be addressed: Following from studies examining fast-fashion impulse consumption and the role of hedonism, there has been limited attention paid to the role of post-consumption emotions, especially when reflecting upon environmental and social impact concerns. It is well established that Generation-Z are highly climate aware and concerned for sustainability (Hurrelmann and Albrecht, 2021), as well as predominantly purchasing fast-fashion and engaging with social media culture (Kale, 2021). As digital natives, Generation-Z engage on social media platforms to entrain themselves, socialise, learn, play and consume (Adgate, 2021); while this contradiction in behaviours exhibits cognitive dissonance (Cairns et al., 2021), understanding how to disrupt current practice offers insight into how to develop more sustainable fashion acquisition models and how best to position marketing activities to encourage sustainable fashion consumption. However, retailing and consumption have been significantly disrupted over the last two years to manage the global pandemic of COVID-19, as have social occasions; this has impacted on fast-fashion sales, with marketing tactics accelerating and process falling as low as eight Pence (UK Sterling)(Blackhall, 2020). Therefore, this exploratory study investigates fast fashion consumers’ reflections of impulse buying, amid concern for environmental and social practices, during a time when lockdown measures are decreasing, ensuring a novel approach. Learnings from this experience are paramount to developing a sustainable fashion industry, especially in understanding the role of emotion in both fashion and sustainability contexts.

Methodology used: Adopting an interpretive approach to enable a rich understanding of the emotions and reflections experienced after post-purchase fast-fashion impulse consumption (Ragab & Arisha, 2018), ten semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with Scottish generation-Z women (aged 19-25 years). Participants were recruited purposively, having experience of frequent impulsive fast-fashion consumption behaviours, and interviews were held early 2022 over a video platform, each lasting approximately an hour. Participants were asked to recall their recent experiences of purchasing online fast fashion and how they felt during each stage of the buying process. Questions included their knowledge of the environmental and social impacts of fast fashion and whether this was reflected in their buying behaviours. The interview data was transcribed, verbatim and thematic analysis was applied to the data.

Results achieved (conclusions) or expected as well as their relevance for theory and practice: Analysis identified that emotion played a role in both the pre and post purchase experience. In particular, marketing ignited emotions pre-purchase and this was exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, where the lockdown had increased a sense of isolation and boredom, and fashion consumption offered a “dopamine rush”. Marketing appeared to induce selective amnesia at the point of purchase, but when reflecting back to “the clothes still sitting in my wardrobe with the tags on” there were expressions of regret. Yet, despite feeling regret post-purchase, impulse buying was reported as a constant cycle that the participates found hard to break. The data illustrates that fashion consumption is awash with emotions, some stimulated by marketing, but other components of conformity, belonging and a sense of self – all of which were challenged during the pandemic. While the data revealed much evidence of cognitive dissonance when reflecting on the social and environmental impact of fast-fashion, there was also evidence of post-purchase cognitive dissonance (Chen, Chen & Lin, 2020), and the participants deviated between accepting responsibility for their contribution to unsustainability and prioritising their consumer selves.

Understanding the role of self, identity, belonging and conformity contributes to developing the sustainable fashion literature, that often focuses on actual behaviours and the well-established attitude behaviour gap. While this gap is acknowledged in the cognitive dissonance experienced by the participants, it is also evident that much can be learned from post-purchase cognitive dissonance and how behaviours and attitudes are impacted by emotions, particularly isolation and boredom. Consequently, this research advances theory including the role of hedonism, especially as emptions were heightened over the COVID years. For example, the participants were not shopping for actual social occasions, rather, they were hedonistically buying for hypothetical occasions, where pleasure was gained from the consumption act itself rather than owning the garment. Understanding this provides relevance for fashion and marketing practice on how to provide hedonistic fashion experiences from alternative fashion acquisition. The findings provide insight into how marketing campaigns for sustainable fashion models can be developed to appeal to Generation-Z consumers.

References
Adgate, B. (2021) Deloitte Report: Digital Media Activities Vary By Generation Age Group, in Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/bradadgate/2021/05/05/deloitte-report-digital-media-activities-vary-by-generation-age-group/?sh=db8069204bec

Bick, R., Halsey, E. & Ekenga, C.C., 2018. The global environmental injustice of fast fashion. Environmental Health. Vol. 17 No. 1, pp.1-4.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-018-0433-7.

Blackhall, M (2020), Critics attack Pretty Little Thing's 8p Black Friday dress deal. The Guardian, November 27 2020 https://www.theguardian.com/business/2020/nov/27/critics-slam-pretty-little-things-8p-black-friday-dress-deal

Cairns, H.M., Ritch, E.L. & Bereziat, C., 2021. Think Eco, Be Eco? The tension between attitudes and behaviours of millennial fashion consumers. International Journal of Consumer Studies. Earlycite, pp.1-16.https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12756.

Chen, W., Chen, C. & Lin, Y., 2020. Understanding the influence of impulse buying toward consumers’ post-purchase dissonance and return intention: an empirical investigation of apparel websites. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, pp.1-14.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-020-02333-z.

Denisova, A., 2021. Fashion Media and Sustainability. London: University of Westminster Press.

Environmental Audit Committee., 2019. Fixing fashion: clothing consumption and sustainability. House of Commons.

Hurrelmann, K., and Albrecht, E., (2021) Gen Z; Between Climate Crisis and Coronavirus Pandemic, Routledge, Oxon

Joung, H., 2014. Fast-fashion consumers’ post-purchase behaviours. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management. Vol. 42 No. 8, pp.688-697.https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-03-2013-0055.

Kale, S., (2021), Out of style: Will Gen-Z ever give up its dangerous love of fast-fashion? The Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/fashion/2021/oct/06/out-of-style-will-gen-z-ever-give-up-its-dangerous-love-of-fast-fashion (accessed 06 October 2021).

Lim, S.H., Lee, S. & Kim, D.J., 2017. Is online consumers’ impulsive buying beneficial for e-commerce companies? An empirical investigation of online consumers’ past impulsive buying behaviors. Information Systems Management. Vol. 34 No. 1, pp.85-100.https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2017.1254458.

Niinimäki, K., Peters, G., Dahlbo, H., Perry, P., Rissanen, T. & Gwilt, a. (2020). The environmental price of fast fashion, Nature Reviews Earth & Environment. Vol. 1 No. 4,189-200.

Ragab, M.A. & Arisha, A., 2018. Research methodology in business: A starter’s guide. Management and Organizational Studies. Vol. 5 No, 1, pp.1-14.https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mohamed-Ragab-22/publication/321769066_Research_Methodology_in_Business_A_Starter's_Guide/links/5a311456aca2724bf72185bf/Research-Methodology-in-Business-A-Starters-Guide.pdf.

Son, H. & Lee, J., 2021. Does online shopping make people feel better? The therapeutic effect of online shopping on Korean female consumers’ mood, self-esteem, and self-efficacy : Based on the context of fashion product shopping. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, Vol. 31 No. 4, pp.580-597. Available from: 10.1080/21639159.2020.1808821https://doi.org/10.1080/21639159.2020.1808821.

Stringer, T., Payne, A.R. & Mortimer, G., 2021. As cheap as humanly possible: why consumers care less about worker welfare. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal. Vol. 1 No. 1, pp.1361-1382.https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-06-2021-0158.

Watson, M.Z. & Yan, R., 2013. An exploratory study of the decision processes of fast versus slow fashion consumers. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal. Vol. 17 No. 2, pp.141-159.https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-02-2011-0045.

Zhang, B., Zhang, Y. & Zhou, P., 2021. Consumer attitude towards sustainability of fast fashion products in the UK. Sustainability. Vol. 13 No. 4, pp.1646.https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041646
Original languageEnglish
Pages20-21
Number of pages2
Publication statusPublished - 18 Nov 2022
EventGlobal Fashion Conference 2022 - Online
Duration: 17 Nov 202218 Nov 2022
http://gfc-conference.eu/

Conference

ConferenceGlobal Fashion Conference 2022
Abbreviated titleGFC2022
Period17/11/2218/11/22
OtherLink to conference website
Internet address

Keywords

  • fast fashion; hedomism; impulse buying; cognitive dissonance; post-purchase regret

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The role of impulse buying on fast fashion consumers’ emotions and behaviours'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this