The reliability of the McCabe score as a marker of co-morbidity in healthcare-associated infection point prevalence studies

J. S. Reilly*, B. Coignard, L. Price, J. Godwin, S. Cairns, S. Hopkins, O. Lyytikäinen, S. Hansen, W. Malcolm, G. J. Hughes

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

27 Citations (Scopus)
247 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This study aimed to ascertain the reliability of the McCabe score in a healthcare-associated infection point prevalence survey. A 10 European Union Member States survey in 20 hospitals (n = 1912) indicated that there was a moderate level of agreement (κ = 0.57) with the score. The reliability of the application of the score could be increased by training data collectors, particularly with reference to the ultimately fatal criteria. This is important if the score is to be used to risk adjust data to drive infection prevention and control interventions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)127-129
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Infection Prevention
Volume17
Issue number3
Early online date20 Nov 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2016

Keywords

  • healthcare-associated infections
  • McCabe score
  • Surveillance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Advanced and Specialised Nursing
  • Infectious Diseases

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The reliability of the McCabe score as a marker of co-morbidity in healthcare-associated infection point prevalence studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this