The practitioners’ perspective on the upside and downside of applying social capital concept in therapeutic settings

Kennedy Sigodu*, Samantha Davis, Antony Morgan

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Social capital, and more particularly the social networks that define its existence, is said to benefit health and well‐being. In individuals recovering from alcohol and drug addiction, social capital accruing from social networks support treatment, recovery and maintenance. Therefore, the concept of social capital is important for public health practitioners working in recovery interventions. This qualitative study seeks to explore what practitioners perceive as the importance of social capital and how they apply the concept in interventions to support individuals recovering from drug and alcohol addiction. Eight public health practitioners involved in drug and substance abuse interventions in West Yorkshire, England, were interviewed. The results of the interview were then deductively coded using two priori themes of perceived impact of social capital on health outcomes and application of social capital theory in recovery interventions. The findings reveal that practitioners understand the impact of social capital as the effects of social networks on recovery and apply the concept in their interventions. However, the nature of interventions created based on similarities in condition (alcohol and substance addiction) and intended outcome (recovery) create bonding social capital with mixed outcomes. This paper argues that the wider benefits to service users are unintentionally inhibited by the overwhelming downsides of bonding social capital. For instance, closed support groups comprised of individuals with high similarities further exclude the already socioeconomically deprived service users from integrating and accessing resources outside their groups.
Original languageEnglish
JournalHealth and Social Care in the Community
Early online date11 Feb 2020
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 11 Feb 2020

Fingerprint

social capital
Substance-Related Disorders
Social Support
Alcoholism
social network
Therapeutics
alcohol
addiction
Public Health
public health
Social Capital
drug dependence
Self-Help Groups
Insurance Benefits
drug abuse
health
England
substance abuse
Group
Maintenance

Keywords

  • Social capital, Recovery capital, Recovery, Social networks, Alcohol and drug misuse,

Cite this

@article{1ba3167b73b14dd981c7c2dd9ac918e8,
title = "The practitioners’ perspective on the upside and downside of applying social capital concept in therapeutic settings",
abstract = "Social capital, and more particularly the social networks that define its existence, is said to benefit health and well‐being. In individuals recovering from alcohol and drug addiction, social capital accruing from social networks support treatment, recovery and maintenance. Therefore, the concept of social capital is important for public health practitioners working in recovery interventions. This qualitative study seeks to explore what practitioners perceive as the importance of social capital and how they apply the concept in interventions to support individuals recovering from drug and alcohol addiction. Eight public health practitioners involved in drug and substance abuse interventions in West Yorkshire, England, were interviewed. The results of the interview were then deductively coded using two priori themes of perceived impact of social capital on health outcomes and application of social capital theory in recovery interventions. The findings reveal that practitioners understand the impact of social capital as the effects of social networks on recovery and apply the concept in their interventions. However, the nature of interventions created based on similarities in condition (alcohol and substance addiction) and intended outcome (recovery) create bonding social capital with mixed outcomes. This paper argues that the wider benefits to service users are unintentionally inhibited by the overwhelming downsides of bonding social capital. For instance, closed support groups comprised of individuals with high similarities further exclude the already socioeconomically deprived service users from integrating and accessing resources outside their groups.",
keywords = "Social capital, Recovery capital, Recovery, Social networks, Alcohol and drug misuse,",
author = "Kennedy Sigodu and Samantha Davis and Antony Morgan",
note = "Acceptance in SAN AAM req'd 30/1/20 DC - version queried 4/2/20 DC with follow-up request 18/2/20 ET AAM: apply 12m embargo",
year = "2020",
month = "2",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1111/hsc.12959",
language = "English",
journal = "Health and Social Care in the Community",
issn = "0966-0410",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The practitioners’ perspective on the upside and downside of applying social capital concept in therapeutic settings

AU - Sigodu, Kennedy

AU - Davis, Samantha

AU - Morgan, Antony

N1 - Acceptance in SAN AAM req'd 30/1/20 DC - version queried 4/2/20 DC with follow-up request 18/2/20 ET AAM: apply 12m embargo

PY - 2020/2/11

Y1 - 2020/2/11

N2 - Social capital, and more particularly the social networks that define its existence, is said to benefit health and well‐being. In individuals recovering from alcohol and drug addiction, social capital accruing from social networks support treatment, recovery and maintenance. Therefore, the concept of social capital is important for public health practitioners working in recovery interventions. This qualitative study seeks to explore what practitioners perceive as the importance of social capital and how they apply the concept in interventions to support individuals recovering from drug and alcohol addiction. Eight public health practitioners involved in drug and substance abuse interventions in West Yorkshire, England, were interviewed. The results of the interview were then deductively coded using two priori themes of perceived impact of social capital on health outcomes and application of social capital theory in recovery interventions. The findings reveal that practitioners understand the impact of social capital as the effects of social networks on recovery and apply the concept in their interventions. However, the nature of interventions created based on similarities in condition (alcohol and substance addiction) and intended outcome (recovery) create bonding social capital with mixed outcomes. This paper argues that the wider benefits to service users are unintentionally inhibited by the overwhelming downsides of bonding social capital. For instance, closed support groups comprised of individuals with high similarities further exclude the already socioeconomically deprived service users from integrating and accessing resources outside their groups.

AB - Social capital, and more particularly the social networks that define its existence, is said to benefit health and well‐being. In individuals recovering from alcohol and drug addiction, social capital accruing from social networks support treatment, recovery and maintenance. Therefore, the concept of social capital is important for public health practitioners working in recovery interventions. This qualitative study seeks to explore what practitioners perceive as the importance of social capital and how they apply the concept in interventions to support individuals recovering from drug and alcohol addiction. Eight public health practitioners involved in drug and substance abuse interventions in West Yorkshire, England, were interviewed. The results of the interview were then deductively coded using two priori themes of perceived impact of social capital on health outcomes and application of social capital theory in recovery interventions. The findings reveal that practitioners understand the impact of social capital as the effects of social networks on recovery and apply the concept in their interventions. However, the nature of interventions created based on similarities in condition (alcohol and substance addiction) and intended outcome (recovery) create bonding social capital with mixed outcomes. This paper argues that the wider benefits to service users are unintentionally inhibited by the overwhelming downsides of bonding social capital. For instance, closed support groups comprised of individuals with high similarities further exclude the already socioeconomically deprived service users from integrating and accessing resources outside their groups.

KW - Social capital, Recovery capital, Recovery, Social networks, Alcohol and drug misuse,

U2 - 10.1111/hsc.12959

DO - 10.1111/hsc.12959

M3 - Article

JO - Health and Social Care in the Community

JF - Health and Social Care in the Community

SN - 0966-0410

ER -