The evidence base for occupational therapy in mental health: more systematic reviews are needed

Katrina Bannigan, Hannah Spring

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

To shape its work, the Research Centre for Occupation & Mental Health is interested in research priorities. Systematic reviews develop an overview of the research available about an intervention, which can provide evidence to underpin practice. They also however, identify gaps in the knowledge base and so are useful for research-prioritization exercises. A rigorous literature search identified only four systematic reviews about occupational therapy in mental health, which suggests that more are needed to underpin practice. This article also explains a six-stage process for conducting a systematic review that can be used by occupational therapists in mental health.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)321-339
Number of pages19
JournalOccupational Therapy in Mental Health
Volume28
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Dec 2012

Keywords

  • systematic reviews
  • research
  • mental health
  • occupational therapy

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The evidence base for occupational therapy in mental health: more systematic reviews are needed'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this