The ethics of and the appropriate legislation concerning killing people and letting them die: a response to Merkel

Hugh V. McLachlan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

With regard to ethics and legislation, what is the significant difference between a doctor terminating the life-supporting treatment of a patient in the course of his job and a greedy relative of the patient doing the same thing to inherit his wealth? Merkel offers an interesting and inventive answer to this question in terms of the improper violation of personal boundaries. However, despite Merkel's claim to the contrary, his answer does not directly address the question of the relevant ethical similarities and differences between killing and letting die in general. Furthermore, it does not provide the basis a plausible rationale for legislation concerning killing and letting die. The questions of whether letting someone die is ethically the same as killing someone and whether it should be treated the same way by the criminal law are not the same as or tantamount to the question of whether or not it involves the transgression of another person's boundaries.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)482-484
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Medical Ethics
Volume43
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 Mar 2017

Fingerprint

Legislation
Ethics
legislation
moral philosophy
Criminal Law
criminal law
human being
Killing
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • ethics
  • legislation
  • Merkel

Cite this

@article{0f83e083c14740f895f3f6880a92a98f,
title = "The ethics of and the appropriate legislation concerning killing people and letting them die: a response to Merkel",
abstract = "With regard to ethics and legislation, what is the significant difference between a doctor terminating the life-supporting treatment of a patient in the course of his job and a greedy relative of the patient doing the same thing to inherit his wealth? Merkel offers an interesting and inventive answer to this question in terms of the improper violation of personal boundaries. However, despite Merkel's claim to the contrary, his answer does not directly address the question of the relevant ethical similarities and differences between killing and letting die in general. Furthermore, it does not provide the basis a plausible rationale for legislation concerning killing and letting die. The questions of whether letting someone die is ethically the same as killing someone and whether it should be treated the same way by the criminal law are not the same as or tantamount to the question of whether or not it involves the transgression of another person's boundaries.",
keywords = "ethics, legislation, Merkel",
author = "McLachlan, {Hugh V.}",
note = "Added on request of author (Emeritus Professor) Acceptance date from journal webpage AAM: no embargo",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1136/medethics-2016-104027",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "482--484",
journal = "Journal of Medical Ethics",
issn = "0306-6800",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "7",

}

The ethics of and the appropriate legislation concerning killing people and letting them die: a response to Merkel. / McLachlan, Hugh V.

In: Journal of Medical Ethics, Vol. 43, No. 7, 22.03.2017, p. 482-484.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The ethics of and the appropriate legislation concerning killing people and letting them die: a response to Merkel

AU - McLachlan, Hugh V.

N1 - Added on request of author (Emeritus Professor) Acceptance date from journal webpage AAM: no embargo

PY - 2017/3/22

Y1 - 2017/3/22

N2 - With regard to ethics and legislation, what is the significant difference between a doctor terminating the life-supporting treatment of a patient in the course of his job and a greedy relative of the patient doing the same thing to inherit his wealth? Merkel offers an interesting and inventive answer to this question in terms of the improper violation of personal boundaries. However, despite Merkel's claim to the contrary, his answer does not directly address the question of the relevant ethical similarities and differences between killing and letting die in general. Furthermore, it does not provide the basis a plausible rationale for legislation concerning killing and letting die. The questions of whether letting someone die is ethically the same as killing someone and whether it should be treated the same way by the criminal law are not the same as or tantamount to the question of whether or not it involves the transgression of another person's boundaries.

AB - With regard to ethics and legislation, what is the significant difference between a doctor terminating the life-supporting treatment of a patient in the course of his job and a greedy relative of the patient doing the same thing to inherit his wealth? Merkel offers an interesting and inventive answer to this question in terms of the improper violation of personal boundaries. However, despite Merkel's claim to the contrary, his answer does not directly address the question of the relevant ethical similarities and differences between killing and letting die in general. Furthermore, it does not provide the basis a plausible rationale for legislation concerning killing and letting die. The questions of whether letting someone die is ethically the same as killing someone and whether it should be treated the same way by the criminal law are not the same as or tantamount to the question of whether or not it involves the transgression of another person's boundaries.

KW - ethics

KW - legislation

KW - Merkel

U2 - 10.1136/medethics-2016-104027

DO - 10.1136/medethics-2016-104027

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 482

EP - 484

JO - Journal of Medical Ethics

JF - Journal of Medical Ethics

SN - 0306-6800

IS - 7

ER -