Abstract
To date, a common view in the health economics literature is that the applicability of cost-benefit analysis (CBA) is limited, due to the distribution problem which underlies its main method of valuation (e.g. willingness to pay). One view is that cost effectiveness analysis (CEA) overcomes these problems. We show that the same distributional concerns apply to non-monetary valuations of health consequences, to measurement of costs and to the decision rules of CEA. Hence adopting CEA over CBA cannot be justified on the basis of 'avoiding' distributional considerations. The implications of our results are discussed, including alternative strategies for the use of 'income-based' research findings in social decision-making.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 55-70 |
Number of pages | 16 |
Journal | Health Economics |
Volume | 11 |
Issue number | 1 |
Early online date | 5 Dec 2001 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jan 2002 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Distribution
- Economic evaluation
- Welfare
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Health Policy