Stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews: a protocol for a systematic review of methods, outcomes and effects

Alex Pollock, Pauline Campbell, Caroline Struthers, Annielise Synnot, Jack Nunn, Sophie Hill, Heather Goodare, Chris Watts, Richard Morley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

88 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background

There is an expectation for stakeholders (including patients, the public, health professionals, and others) to be involved in research. Researchers are increasingly recognising that it is good practice to involve stakeholders in systematic reviews. There is currently a lack of evidence about (A) how to do this and (B) the effects, or impact, of such involvement. We aim to create a map of the evidence relating to stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews, and use this evidence to address the two points above.

Methods

We will complete a mixed-method synthesis of the evidence, first completing a scoping review to create a broad map of evidence relating to stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews, and secondly completing two contingent syntheses. We will use a stepwise approach to searching; the initial step will include comprehensive searches of electronic databases, including CENTRAL, AMED, Embase, Medline, Cinahl and other databases, supplemented with pre-defined hand-searching and contacting authors. Two reviewers will undertake each review task (i.e., screening, data extraction) using standard systematic review processes.

For the scoping review, we will include any paper, regardless of publication status or study design, which investigates, reports or discusses involvement in a systematic review. Included papers will be summarised within structured tables. Criteria for judging the focus and comprehensiveness of the description of methods of involvement will be applied, informing which papers are included within the two contingent syntheses.

Synthesis A will detail the methods that have been used to involve stakeholders in systematic reviews. Papers from the scoping review that are judged to provide an adequate description of methods or approaches will be included. Details of the methods of involvement will be extracted from included papers using pre-defined headings, presented in tables and described narratively.

Synthesis B will include studies that explore the effect of stakeholder involvement on the quality, relevance or impact of a systematic review, as identified from the scoping review. Study quality will be appraised, data extracted and synthesised within tables.

Discussion
This review should help researchers select, improve and evaluate methods of involving stakeholders in systematic reviews. Review findings will contribute to Cochrane training resources.
Original languageEnglish
Article number9
Number of pages13
JournalResearch Involvement and Engagement
Volume3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 21 Apr 2017

Keywords

  • systematic reviews
  • stakeholder
  • protocol

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews: a protocol for a systematic review of methods, outcomes and effects'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this