Special issue on single-case research in sport psychology

Jamie B. Barker, Stephen D. Mellalieu, Paul J. McCarthy, Mark V. Jones, Aidan Moran

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

Abstract

The seminal work of Kazdin (1982) and Barlow and Hersen (1984) into single-case research has prompted many repeated calls for sport psychologists to adopt these methods into their research and practice (e.g., Bryan, 1987; Hrycaiko & Martin, 1996; Smith, 1988; Williams, Hardy, & Mutrie, 2008). These calls seem appropriate on at least three levels. First, demonstrating consultancy effectiveness and accountability are key components of accreditation programmes (e.g., Association of Applied Sport Psychology; British Psychological Society), along with professional practice, and applied research (Andersen, Miles, Mahoney, & Robinson, 2002; Smith, 1989). Second, single-case designs (SCDs) permit researchers working in applied settings and with small samples, procedures with which to determine the mechanisms related to intervention effectiveness and efficacy (Seligman, 1995). Finally, other branches of psychology (e.g., psychiatry, counselling, and education) embraced single case research methods many years ago and now see them as integrative to applied research (cf. Morgan & Morgan, 2009).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-3
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Applied Sport Psychology
Volume25
Issue number1
Early online date5 Dec 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2013

Keywords

  • sport psychology
  • single-case research

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Special issue on single-case research in sport psychology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this