Social work and countering violent extremism in Sweden and the UK

Jo Finch, Jessica H. Jonsson, Masoud Kamali, David McKendrick

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Social Work in Europe, is now being tasked with managing the ‘problems’ of terrorism, i.e supporting those affected by terrorist attacks, managing returnees affiliated with Terrorist groups in the Middle East, or, as will be discussed here, identifying those at risk from radicalisation and extremism. Both Britain and Sweden have Counter-Terrorism policies, but recent developments in both countries have made it a statutory requirement for social workers to work within such policies. This paper seeks to explore the policies in both countries, utilising a comparative approach to consider the similarities in not only policy and practice but also in the ethical consequences such policies pose for social workers across Europe. The exploration considers; the extent to which anti-radicalisation policies influence social work practices in Sweden and the UK and how they might undermine social work as a human rights profession. The results indicate that anti-radicalisation policies run the risk of reducing social work to become a ‘policing profession’ practising social control. This has substantial consequences for social work and its global ethics, which should be considered and struggled against by social workers committed to principles of social justice and human rights.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages12
JournalEuropean Journal of Social Work
Early online date11 Sep 2019
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 11 Sep 2019

Fingerprint

radicalism
Sweden
social work
radicalization
social worker
terrorism
human rights
profession
social control
Middle East
social justice
moral philosophy
Group

Keywords

  • social work
  • counter-terrorism
  • radicalisation
  • extremism
  • racism

Cite this

@article{05b1f52f36e1491582d26340b37c3ed3,
title = "Social work and countering violent extremism in Sweden and the UK",
abstract = "Social Work in Europe, is now being tasked with managing the ‘problems’ of terrorism, i.e supporting those affected by terrorist attacks, managing returnees affiliated with Terrorist groups in the Middle East, or, as will be discussed here, identifying those at risk from radicalisation and extremism. Both Britain and Sweden have Counter-Terrorism policies, but recent developments in both countries have made it a statutory requirement for social workers to work within such policies. This paper seeks to explore the policies in both countries, utilising a comparative approach to consider the similarities in not only policy and practice but also in the ethical consequences such policies pose for social workers across Europe. The exploration considers; the extent to which anti-radicalisation policies influence social work practices in Sweden and the UK and how they might undermine social work as a human rights profession. The results indicate that anti-radicalisation policies run the risk of reducing social work to become a ‘policing profession’ practising social control. This has substantial consequences for social work and its global ethics, which should be considered and struggled against by social workers committed to principles of social justice and human rights.",
keywords = "social work, counter-terrorism, radicalisation, extremism, racism",
author = "Jo Finch and Jonsson, {Jessica H.} and Masoud Kamali and David McKendrick",
note = "Removed Google doc link Acceptance in SAN AAM: 12m embargo Also deleted earlier record (for the article at submitted stage) with note to author. ET",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1080/13691457.2019.1657803",
language = "English",
journal = "European Journal of Social Work",
issn = "1369-1457",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis Group",

}

Social work and countering violent extremism in Sweden and the UK. / Finch, Jo; Jonsson, Jessica H. ; Kamali, Masoud; McKendrick, David.

In: European Journal of Social Work, 11.09.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social work and countering violent extremism in Sweden and the UK

AU - Finch, Jo

AU - Jonsson, Jessica H.

AU - Kamali, Masoud

AU - McKendrick, David

N1 - Removed Google doc link Acceptance in SAN AAM: 12m embargo Also deleted earlier record (for the article at submitted stage) with note to author. ET

PY - 2019/9/11

Y1 - 2019/9/11

N2 - Social Work in Europe, is now being tasked with managing the ‘problems’ of terrorism, i.e supporting those affected by terrorist attacks, managing returnees affiliated with Terrorist groups in the Middle East, or, as will be discussed here, identifying those at risk from radicalisation and extremism. Both Britain and Sweden have Counter-Terrorism policies, but recent developments in both countries have made it a statutory requirement for social workers to work within such policies. This paper seeks to explore the policies in both countries, utilising a comparative approach to consider the similarities in not only policy and practice but also in the ethical consequences such policies pose for social workers across Europe. The exploration considers; the extent to which anti-radicalisation policies influence social work practices in Sweden and the UK and how they might undermine social work as a human rights profession. The results indicate that anti-radicalisation policies run the risk of reducing social work to become a ‘policing profession’ practising social control. This has substantial consequences for social work and its global ethics, which should be considered and struggled against by social workers committed to principles of social justice and human rights.

AB - Social Work in Europe, is now being tasked with managing the ‘problems’ of terrorism, i.e supporting those affected by terrorist attacks, managing returnees affiliated with Terrorist groups in the Middle East, or, as will be discussed here, identifying those at risk from radicalisation and extremism. Both Britain and Sweden have Counter-Terrorism policies, but recent developments in both countries have made it a statutory requirement for social workers to work within such policies. This paper seeks to explore the policies in both countries, utilising a comparative approach to consider the similarities in not only policy and practice but also in the ethical consequences such policies pose for social workers across Europe. The exploration considers; the extent to which anti-radicalisation policies influence social work practices in Sweden and the UK and how they might undermine social work as a human rights profession. The results indicate that anti-radicalisation policies run the risk of reducing social work to become a ‘policing profession’ practising social control. This has substantial consequences for social work and its global ethics, which should be considered and struggled against by social workers committed to principles of social justice and human rights.

KW - social work

KW - counter-terrorism

KW - radicalisation

KW - extremism

KW - racism

U2 - 10.1080/13691457.2019.1657803

DO - 10.1080/13691457.2019.1657803

M3 - Article

JO - European Journal of Social Work

JF - European Journal of Social Work

SN - 1369-1457

ER -