Social enterprises in quasi-markets: Exploring the critical knowledge gaps

Chris Mason, Michael J. Roy, Gemma Carey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose
This paper aims to explore how social enterprises are treated in scholarly research on quasi-markets. In so doing, the paper aims to show that a number of critical knowledge gaps persist which require deeper engagement from researchers, practitioners and policymakers alike.

Design/methodology/approach
This study adopts a conceptual analysis of the existing literature concerning social enterprises and quasi-markets.

Findings
The paper finds that there are four main knowledge gaps in this area. First, there are moral dilemmas created by boundary shifts, arising from the development of quasi-markets. Second, the phenomenon of “tactical mimicry” (Day and Teasdale 2016) represents a key theoretical platform not yet fully explored. Third, the lack of clear, comparative assessments of social enterprises across quasi-markets, and other types of service providers is also apparent despite offering a significant methodological opportunity for scholars. Fourth, there is the issue of how social enterprises engage in, and resource the operational functions that will support their management of conflicting logics, especially rigorous impact measurement.

Originality/value
This paper uses a synthesis of key social enterprise and quasi-market studies to extend current debate in this area, which tends to be diffused and complex. By focussing on critical knowledge gaps, the paper contributes a meta-level appraisal of the key areas for future research, providing a focussed agenda for scholars to target their efforts in growing this important body of knowledge.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)358-375
Number of pages18
JournalSocial Enterprise Journal
Volume15
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Aug 2019

Fingerprint

knowledge gap
market
mimicry
service provider
methodology
Social enterprise
Quasi-markets
Knowledge gap
Critical knowledge
resource
lack
management
resources
knowledge

Keywords

  • social enterprise
  • research agenda
  • quasi-markets

Cite this

Mason, Chris ; Roy, Michael J. ; Carey, Gemma. / Social enterprises in quasi-markets: Exploring the critical knowledge gaps. In: Social Enterprise Journal. 2019 ; Vol. 15, No. 3. pp. 358-375.
@article{39e0ee4dba7e417ea8f9b721276dbdd9,
title = "Social enterprises in quasi-markets: Exploring the critical knowledge gaps",
abstract = "PurposeThis paper aims to explore how social enterprises are treated in scholarly research on quasi-markets. In so doing, the paper aims to show that a number of critical knowledge gaps persist which require deeper engagement from researchers, practitioners and policymakers alike.Design/methodology/approachThis study adopts a conceptual analysis of the existing literature concerning social enterprises and quasi-markets.FindingsThe paper finds that there are four main knowledge gaps in this area. First, there are moral dilemmas created by boundary shifts, arising from the development of quasi-markets. Second, the phenomenon of “tactical mimicry” (Day and Teasdale 2016) represents a key theoretical platform not yet fully explored. Third, the lack of clear, comparative assessments of social enterprises across quasi-markets, and other types of service providers is also apparent despite offering a significant methodological opportunity for scholars. Fourth, there is the issue of how social enterprises engage in, and resource the operational functions that will support their management of conflicting logics, especially rigorous impact measurement.Originality/valueThis paper uses a synthesis of key social enterprise and quasi-market studies to extend current debate in this area, which tends to be diffused and complex. By focussing on critical knowledge gaps, the paper contributes a meta-level appraisal of the key areas for future research, providing a focussed agenda for scholars to target their efforts in growing this important body of knowledge.",
keywords = "social enterprise , research agenda, quasi-markets",
author = "Chris Mason and Roy, {Michael J.} and Gemma Carey",
note = "Acceptance from webpage AAM: no embargo upon publication Added pre-pub embargo end date. ET 8/11/19 Should be OA compliant - issue with access date and embargo end date (known bug in 5.16.1). ET 8/11/19",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1108/SEJ-09-2018-0061",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "358--375",
number = "3",

}

Mason, C, Roy, MJ & Carey, G 2019, 'Social enterprises in quasi-markets: Exploring the critical knowledge gaps', Social Enterprise Journal, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 358-375. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-09-2018-0061

Social enterprises in quasi-markets: Exploring the critical knowledge gaps. / Mason, Chris; Roy, Michael J.; Carey, Gemma.

In: Social Enterprise Journal, Vol. 15, No. 3, 08.08.2019, p. 358-375.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social enterprises in quasi-markets: Exploring the critical knowledge gaps

AU - Mason, Chris

AU - Roy, Michael J.

AU - Carey, Gemma

N1 - Acceptance from webpage AAM: no embargo upon publication Added pre-pub embargo end date. ET 8/11/19 Should be OA compliant - issue with access date and embargo end date (known bug in 5.16.1). ET 8/11/19

PY - 2019/8/8

Y1 - 2019/8/8

N2 - PurposeThis paper aims to explore how social enterprises are treated in scholarly research on quasi-markets. In so doing, the paper aims to show that a number of critical knowledge gaps persist which require deeper engagement from researchers, practitioners and policymakers alike.Design/methodology/approachThis study adopts a conceptual analysis of the existing literature concerning social enterprises and quasi-markets.FindingsThe paper finds that there are four main knowledge gaps in this area. First, there are moral dilemmas created by boundary shifts, arising from the development of quasi-markets. Second, the phenomenon of “tactical mimicry” (Day and Teasdale 2016) represents a key theoretical platform not yet fully explored. Third, the lack of clear, comparative assessments of social enterprises across quasi-markets, and other types of service providers is also apparent despite offering a significant methodological opportunity for scholars. Fourth, there is the issue of how social enterprises engage in, and resource the operational functions that will support their management of conflicting logics, especially rigorous impact measurement.Originality/valueThis paper uses a synthesis of key social enterprise and quasi-market studies to extend current debate in this area, which tends to be diffused and complex. By focussing on critical knowledge gaps, the paper contributes a meta-level appraisal of the key areas for future research, providing a focussed agenda for scholars to target their efforts in growing this important body of knowledge.

AB - PurposeThis paper aims to explore how social enterprises are treated in scholarly research on quasi-markets. In so doing, the paper aims to show that a number of critical knowledge gaps persist which require deeper engagement from researchers, practitioners and policymakers alike.Design/methodology/approachThis study adopts a conceptual analysis of the existing literature concerning social enterprises and quasi-markets.FindingsThe paper finds that there are four main knowledge gaps in this area. First, there are moral dilemmas created by boundary shifts, arising from the development of quasi-markets. Second, the phenomenon of “tactical mimicry” (Day and Teasdale 2016) represents a key theoretical platform not yet fully explored. Third, the lack of clear, comparative assessments of social enterprises across quasi-markets, and other types of service providers is also apparent despite offering a significant methodological opportunity for scholars. Fourth, there is the issue of how social enterprises engage in, and resource the operational functions that will support their management of conflicting logics, especially rigorous impact measurement.Originality/valueThis paper uses a synthesis of key social enterprise and quasi-market studies to extend current debate in this area, which tends to be diffused and complex. By focussing on critical knowledge gaps, the paper contributes a meta-level appraisal of the key areas for future research, providing a focussed agenda for scholars to target their efforts in growing this important body of knowledge.

KW - social enterprise

KW - research agenda

KW - quasi-markets

U2 - 10.1108/SEJ-09-2018-0061

DO - 10.1108/SEJ-09-2018-0061

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 358

EP - 375

IS - 3

ER -