‘Sensational spikes’ and ‘isolated incidents’: examining the misrepresentation of domestic abuse by the media using the case studies of football and Covid-19’

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)peer-review

Abstract

This chapter examines how the media (mis)represents domestic violence and abuse (DVA) and perpetuates misunderstandings using two case studies that originally looked at the context of media reports in terms of football and Covid-19. Using Kitzinger's template model, it argues that the media has used a fixed method of reporting DVA that prioritises certain types of abuse, involving a particular kind of victim and /or perpetrator. Although advances have been made here, encouraged by the proliferation of reporting guidelines in the main these have focused on improved reporting on victim/survivors and perpetrators. It is argued here that by framing cases as singular “incidents” or as a set of “spikes” the media continues to perpetuate a misrepresentation of the phenomenon of DVA as one-off episodes of physical violence. In doing so a more nuanced understanding of DVA as coercive control and as a course of conduct is disregarded. The chapter concludes with recommendations to prioritise the social context of DVA and the need to understand the dynamics of domestic violence as a pattern of abusive behaviours and gender inequalities, rather than viewing it as a reaction to a specific event.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationRoutledge Companion to Gender, Media and Violence
EditorsKaren Boyle, Susan Berridge
Place of PublicationLondon
PublisherRoutledge
Chapter1
Number of pages11
ISBN (Electronic)9781003200871
ISBN (Print)9781032061368, 9781032061382
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '‘Sensational spikes’ and ‘isolated incidents’: examining the misrepresentation of domestic abuse by the media using the case studies of football and Covid-19’'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this