Abstract
Objective:
To examine the cost-effectiveness of self-managed computerised word finding therapy as an add-on to usual care for people with aphasia post-stroke.
Design:
Cost-effectiveness modelling over a life-time period, taking a UK National Health Service (NHS) and personal social service perspective.
Setting:
Based on the Big CACTUS randomised controlled trial, conducted in 21 UK NHS speech and language therapy departments.
Participants:
Big CACTUS included 278 people with long-standing aphasia post-stroke.
Interventions:
Computerised word finding therapy plus usual care; usual care alone; usual care plus attention control.
Main measures:
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) were calculated, comparing the cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained for each intervention. Credible intervals (CrI) for costs and QALYs, and probabilities of cost-effectiveness, were obtained using probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Subgroup and scenario analyses investigated cost-effectiveness in different subsets of the population, and the sensitivity of results to key model inputs.
Results:
Adding computerised word finding therapy to usual care had an ICER of £42,686 per QALY gained compared with usual care alone (incremental QALY gain: 0.02 per patient (95% CrI: −0.05 to 0.10); incremental costs: £732.73 per patient (95% CrI: £674.23 to £798.05)). ICERs for subgroups with mild or moderate word finding difficulties were £22,371 and £21,262 per QALY gained respectively.
Conclusion:
Computerised word finding therapy represents a low cost add-on to usual care, but QALY gains and estimates of cost-effectiveness are uncertain. Computerised therapy is more likely to be cost-effective for people with mild or moderate, as opposed to severe, word finding difficulties.
To examine the cost-effectiveness of self-managed computerised word finding therapy as an add-on to usual care for people with aphasia post-stroke.
Design:
Cost-effectiveness modelling over a life-time period, taking a UK National Health Service (NHS) and personal social service perspective.
Setting:
Based on the Big CACTUS randomised controlled trial, conducted in 21 UK NHS speech and language therapy departments.
Participants:
Big CACTUS included 278 people with long-standing aphasia post-stroke.
Interventions:
Computerised word finding therapy plus usual care; usual care alone; usual care plus attention control.
Main measures:
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) were calculated, comparing the cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained for each intervention. Credible intervals (CrI) for costs and QALYs, and probabilities of cost-effectiveness, were obtained using probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Subgroup and scenario analyses investigated cost-effectiveness in different subsets of the population, and the sensitivity of results to key model inputs.
Results:
Adding computerised word finding therapy to usual care had an ICER of £42,686 per QALY gained compared with usual care alone (incremental QALY gain: 0.02 per patient (95% CrI: −0.05 to 0.10); incremental costs: £732.73 per patient (95% CrI: £674.23 to £798.05)). ICERs for subgroups with mild or moderate word finding difficulties were £22,371 and £21,262 per QALY gained respectively.
Conclusion:
Computerised word finding therapy represents a low cost add-on to usual care, but QALY gains and estimates of cost-effectiveness are uncertain. Computerised therapy is more likely to be cost-effective for people with mild or moderate, as opposed to severe, word finding difficulties.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 703-717 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Clinical Rehabilitation |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| Early online date | 24 Nov 2020 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 May 2021 |
Keywords
- aphasia
- cost-effectiveness
- health services
- rehabilitation
- treatment
- computer supported
- self-management
- speech therapy
- Aphasia
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Rehabilitation
- Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
Documents and Links
- Latimer, N.R. et al (2020)Self-managed, computerised word finding therapy as an add-on to usual care for chronic aphasia post-stroke an economic evaluation
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).