Revisiting the rule of optimism

Martin Kettle*, Sharon Jackson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The ‘rule of optimism’ has been a key feature of child protection discourse in the UK since being introduced as a theoretical construct over thirty years ago. It has continuously been drawn upon to explain professional action and has been most notably utilised as a powerful explanatory device within Serious Case Reviews (SCRs). Yet, despite its longevity, the deployment of the construct has been subject to very little critique. This paper seeks to redress that balance and will explore how ‘the rule’ as an explanatory device has become rearticulated and repositioned as an individualising psychological construct which has almost invariably focused attention on the practices of individual social workers at the expense of an analysis of the structural conditions which frame these practices. In doing so, this paper traces the origins of the rule and explores the integrity and thrust of contemporary applications. Evidence from recent SCRs will be drawn upon to suggest that ‘the rule’, albeit in its psychologically distilled form, retains currency. Drawing on the work of Berlant, ‘the rule of optimism’ will be reconsidered alongside an exploration of the ‘role of optimism’.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1624-1640
Number of pages17
JournalBritish Journal of Social Work
Volume47
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14 Oct 2017

Keywords

  • professional practice
  • decision making
  • child protection

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Revisiting the rule of optimism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Profiles

    No photo of Martin Kettle

    Cite this