Revisiting the rule of optimism

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The ‘rule of optimism’ has been a key feature of child protection discourse in the UK since being introduced as a theoretical construct over thirty years ago. It has continuously been drawn upon to explain professional action and has been most notably utilised as a powerful explanatory device within Serious Case Reviews (SCRs). Yet, despite its longevity, the deployment of the construct has been subject to very little critique. This paper seeks to redress that balance and will explore how ‘the rule’ as an explanatory device has become rearticulated and repositioned as an individualising psychological construct which has almost invariably focused attention on the practices of individual social workers at the expense of an analysis of the structural conditions which frame these practices. In doing so, this paper traces the origins of the rule and explores the integrity and thrust of contemporary applications. Evidence from recent SCRs will be drawn upon to suggest that ‘the rule’, albeit in its psychologically distilled form, retains currency. Drawing on the work of Berlant, ‘the rule of optimism’ will be reconsidered alongside an exploration of the ‘role of optimism’.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1624-1640
Number of pages17
JournalBritish Journal of Social Work
Volume47
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14 Oct 2017

Fingerprint

optimism
Equipment and Supplies
child protection
currency
integrity
social worker
Psychology
discourse
evidence
Optimism

Keywords

  • professional practice, decision making, child protection

Cite this

@article{e8af958323c14590bed966f4dcc88213,
title = "Revisiting the rule of optimism",
abstract = "The ‘rule of optimism’ has been a key feature of child protection discourse in the UK since being introduced as a theoretical construct over thirty years ago. It has continuously been drawn upon to explain professional action and has been most notably utilised as a powerful explanatory device within Serious Case Reviews (SCRs). Yet, despite its longevity, the deployment of the construct has been subject to very little critique. This paper seeks to redress that balance and will explore how ‘the rule’ as an explanatory device has become rearticulated and repositioned as an individualising psychological construct which has almost invariably focused attention on the practices of individual social workers at the expense of an analysis of the structural conditions which frame these practices. In doing so, this paper traces the origins of the rule and explores the integrity and thrust of contemporary applications. Evidence from recent SCRs will be drawn upon to suggest that ‘the rule’, albeit in its psychologically distilled form, retains currency. Drawing on the work of Berlant, ‘the rule of optimism’ will be reconsidered alongside an exploration of the ‘role of optimism’.",
keywords = "professional practice, decision making, child protection",
author = "Martin Kettle and Sharon Jackson",
note = "Acceptance date: used last date of month from VoR. VoR is free to read but not OA. AAM: requested 24-10-17 and 19-7-18; further request 24/1/19 ET. Applied 'no exception' as no file available. ET 6/11/19",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1093/bjsw/bcx090",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "1624--1640",
journal = "British Journal of Social Work",
issn = "0045-3102",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "6",

}

Revisiting the rule of optimism. / Kettle, Martin; Jackson, Sharon.

In: British Journal of Social Work, Vol. 47, No. 6, 14.10.2017, p. 1624-1640.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Revisiting the rule of optimism

AU - Kettle, Martin

AU - Jackson, Sharon

N1 - Acceptance date: used last date of month from VoR. VoR is free to read but not OA. AAM: requested 24-10-17 and 19-7-18; further request 24/1/19 ET. Applied 'no exception' as no file available. ET 6/11/19

PY - 2017/10/14

Y1 - 2017/10/14

N2 - The ‘rule of optimism’ has been a key feature of child protection discourse in the UK since being introduced as a theoretical construct over thirty years ago. It has continuously been drawn upon to explain professional action and has been most notably utilised as a powerful explanatory device within Serious Case Reviews (SCRs). Yet, despite its longevity, the deployment of the construct has been subject to very little critique. This paper seeks to redress that balance and will explore how ‘the rule’ as an explanatory device has become rearticulated and repositioned as an individualising psychological construct which has almost invariably focused attention on the practices of individual social workers at the expense of an analysis of the structural conditions which frame these practices. In doing so, this paper traces the origins of the rule and explores the integrity and thrust of contemporary applications. Evidence from recent SCRs will be drawn upon to suggest that ‘the rule’, albeit in its psychologically distilled form, retains currency. Drawing on the work of Berlant, ‘the rule of optimism’ will be reconsidered alongside an exploration of the ‘role of optimism’.

AB - The ‘rule of optimism’ has been a key feature of child protection discourse in the UK since being introduced as a theoretical construct over thirty years ago. It has continuously been drawn upon to explain professional action and has been most notably utilised as a powerful explanatory device within Serious Case Reviews (SCRs). Yet, despite its longevity, the deployment of the construct has been subject to very little critique. This paper seeks to redress that balance and will explore how ‘the rule’ as an explanatory device has become rearticulated and repositioned as an individualising psychological construct which has almost invariably focused attention on the practices of individual social workers at the expense of an analysis of the structural conditions which frame these practices. In doing so, this paper traces the origins of the rule and explores the integrity and thrust of contemporary applications. Evidence from recent SCRs will be drawn upon to suggest that ‘the rule’, albeit in its psychologically distilled form, retains currency. Drawing on the work of Berlant, ‘the rule of optimism’ will be reconsidered alongside an exploration of the ‘role of optimism’.

KW - professional practice, decision making, child protection

U2 - 10.1093/bjsw/bcx090

DO - 10.1093/bjsw/bcx090

M3 - Article

VL - 47

SP - 1624

EP - 1640

JO - British Journal of Social Work

JF - British Journal of Social Work

SN - 0045-3102

IS - 6

ER -