Rethinking yellow flags

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The use of Yellow Flags has become widespread in clinical practice, as a means to identify clients with low back pain who might not respond favourably to physical treatments. However, using questionnaires to identify psychosocial risk factors that can result in ongoing pain and suffering is not a straightforward matter, and if used without due thought could result in an impoverished service for the client. This discussion article aims to raise awareness of the issues that emerge when relying on Yellow Flags; including the practicalities of using forced-choice questionnaires to identify complex interactions between a client’s social environment and their psychological state. Yellow Flags are based on a biopsychosocial model of health, yet this paper argues that the use of Yellow Flags, in practice, belongs within a reductionist paradigm. By calling attention to the issues raised, we envisage a better utilization of the biopsychosocial model; whereby taking account of a client’s unique experience and meaning of pain will enable the individual to be managed with a more genuine and insightful understanding than seemingly occurs at the present time.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)196-198
Number of pages3
JournalManual Therapy
Volume16
Issue number2
Early online date24 Dec 2010
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2011

Fingerprint

Psychology
Pain
Social Environment
Low Back Pain
Psychological Stress
Health
Surveys and Questionnaires
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • yellow flags
  • biopsychosocial model
  • psychological state

Cite this

Stewart, Jennie ; Kempenaar, Larissa ; Lauchlan, Douglas. / Rethinking yellow flags. In: Manual Therapy. 2011 ; Vol. 16, No. 2. pp. 196-198.
@article{4a86be6c9a5940568df3ba1d386475ed,
title = "Rethinking yellow flags",
abstract = "The use of Yellow Flags has become widespread in clinical practice, as a means to identify clients with low back pain who might not respond favourably to physical treatments. However, using questionnaires to identify psychosocial risk factors that can result in ongoing pain and suffering is not a straightforward matter, and if used without due thought could result in an impoverished service for the client. This discussion article aims to raise awareness of the issues that emerge when relying on Yellow Flags; including the practicalities of using forced-choice questionnaires to identify complex interactions between a client’s social environment and their psychological state. Yellow Flags are based on a biopsychosocial model of health, yet this paper argues that the use of Yellow Flags, in practice, belongs within a reductionist paradigm. By calling attention to the issues raised, we envisage a better utilization of the biopsychosocial model; whereby taking account of a client’s unique experience and meaning of pain will enable the individual to be managed with a more genuine and insightful understanding than seemingly occurs at the present time.",
keywords = "yellow flags, biopsychosocial model, psychological state",
author = "Jennie Stewart and Larissa Kempenaar and Douglas Lauchlan",
year = "2011",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.math.2010.11.005",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "196--198",
journal = "Manual Therapy",
issn = "1356-689X",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

Rethinking yellow flags. / Stewart, Jennie; Kempenaar, Larissa; Lauchlan, Douglas.

In: Manual Therapy, Vol. 16, No. 2, 04.2011, p. 196-198.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rethinking yellow flags

AU - Stewart, Jennie

AU - Kempenaar, Larissa

AU - Lauchlan, Douglas

PY - 2011/4

Y1 - 2011/4

N2 - The use of Yellow Flags has become widespread in clinical practice, as a means to identify clients with low back pain who might not respond favourably to physical treatments. However, using questionnaires to identify psychosocial risk factors that can result in ongoing pain and suffering is not a straightforward matter, and if used without due thought could result in an impoverished service for the client. This discussion article aims to raise awareness of the issues that emerge when relying on Yellow Flags; including the practicalities of using forced-choice questionnaires to identify complex interactions between a client’s social environment and their psychological state. Yellow Flags are based on a biopsychosocial model of health, yet this paper argues that the use of Yellow Flags, in practice, belongs within a reductionist paradigm. By calling attention to the issues raised, we envisage a better utilization of the biopsychosocial model; whereby taking account of a client’s unique experience and meaning of pain will enable the individual to be managed with a more genuine and insightful understanding than seemingly occurs at the present time.

AB - The use of Yellow Flags has become widespread in clinical practice, as a means to identify clients with low back pain who might not respond favourably to physical treatments. However, using questionnaires to identify psychosocial risk factors that can result in ongoing pain and suffering is not a straightforward matter, and if used without due thought could result in an impoverished service for the client. This discussion article aims to raise awareness of the issues that emerge when relying on Yellow Flags; including the practicalities of using forced-choice questionnaires to identify complex interactions between a client’s social environment and their psychological state. Yellow Flags are based on a biopsychosocial model of health, yet this paper argues that the use of Yellow Flags, in practice, belongs within a reductionist paradigm. By calling attention to the issues raised, we envisage a better utilization of the biopsychosocial model; whereby taking account of a client’s unique experience and meaning of pain will enable the individual to be managed with a more genuine and insightful understanding than seemingly occurs at the present time.

KW - yellow flags

KW - biopsychosocial model

KW - psychological state

U2 - 10.1016/j.math.2010.11.005

DO - 10.1016/j.math.2010.11.005

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 196

EP - 198

JO - Manual Therapy

JF - Manual Therapy

SN - 1356-689X

IS - 2

ER -