Reflections on applying a criteria to evaluate a serious game

David Farrell; Yasemin Allsop; Olga Shabalina; Pierre Grace; Christos Malliarakis

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-23766-4_58

Reflections on applying a criteria to evaluate a serious game

David Farrell, Yasemin Allsop, Olga Shabalina, Pierre Grace, Christos Malliarakis

Applied Computer Games

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

Abstract

Whilst the field of Serious Games is maturing, the problem of how to identify a good game is still unresolved. Several criteria for game evaluation have been proposed and tested by academics but there are few reports academics using other people’s criteria, or of several experts applying the same criteria to a game to see if they agree on the game’s qualities. This paper presents an evaluation of a game that is under redevelopment. A third party evaluation criteria is applied by four independent experts and the results are reflected on by the game’s designer. Where the experts and designer disagree, the reasons are examined. Finally questions are raised about the risks inherent to any distillation of academic theory to practical evaluation tool.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Communications in Computer and Information Science
Publisher	Springer Verlag
Pages	734-747
Number of pages	14
Volume	535
ISBN (Electronic)	9783319237664
ISBN (Print)	9783319237657
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23766-4_58
Publication status	Published - 1 Dec 2015

Keywords

educational games
evaluation
expert evaluation
games based learning
serious games

Documents and Links

10.1007/978-3-319-23766-4_58

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Reflections on applying a criteria to evaluate a serious game'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

Farrell, D., Allsop, Y., Shabalina, O., Grace, P., & Malliarakis, C. (2015). Reflections on applying a criteria to evaluate a serious game. In Communications in Computer and Information Science (Vol. 535, pp. 734-747). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23766-4_58

@inproceedings{34f07e000f2b49888fbe3bccf0c1cff7,

title = "Reflections on applying a criteria to evaluate a serious game",

abstract = "Whilst the field of Serious Games is maturing, the problem of how to identify a good game is still unresolved. Several criteria for game evaluation have been proposed and tested by academics but there are few reports academics using other people{\textquoteright}s criteria, or of several experts applying the same criteria to a game to see if they agree on the game{\textquoteright}s qualities. This paper presents an evaluation of a game that is under redevelopment. A third party evaluation criteria is applied by four independent experts and the results are reflected on by the game{\textquoteright}s designer. Where the experts and designer disagree, the reasons are examined. Finally questions are raised about the risks inherent to any distillation of academic theory to practical evaluation tool.",

keywords = "educational games, evaluation, expert evaluation, games based learning, serious games",

author = "David Farrell and Yasemin Allsop and Olga Shabalina and Pierre Grace and Christos Malliarakis",

year = "2015",

month = dec,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-23766-4_58",

language = "English",

isbn = "9783319237657",

volume = "535",

pages = "734--747",

booktitle = "Communications in Computer and Information Science",

publisher = "Springer Verlag",

address = "Germany",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Reflections on applying a criteria to evaluate a serious game

AU - Farrell, David

AU - Allsop, Yasemin

AU - Shabalina, Olga

AU - Grace, Pierre

AU - Malliarakis, Christos

PY - 2015/12/1

Y1 - 2015/12/1

N2 - Whilst the field of Serious Games is maturing, the problem of how to identify a good game is still unresolved. Several criteria for game evaluation have been proposed and tested by academics but there are few reports academics using other people’s criteria, or of several experts applying the same criteria to a game to see if they agree on the game’s qualities. This paper presents an evaluation of a game that is under redevelopment. A third party evaluation criteria is applied by four independent experts and the results are reflected on by the game’s designer. Where the experts and designer disagree, the reasons are examined. Finally questions are raised about the risks inherent to any distillation of academic theory to practical evaluation tool.

AB - Whilst the field of Serious Games is maturing, the problem of how to identify a good game is still unresolved. Several criteria for game evaluation have been proposed and tested by academics but there are few reports academics using other people’s criteria, or of several experts applying the same criteria to a game to see if they agree on the game’s qualities. This paper presents an evaluation of a game that is under redevelopment. A third party evaluation criteria is applied by four independent experts and the results are reflected on by the game’s designer. Where the experts and designer disagree, the reasons are examined. Finally questions are raised about the risks inherent to any distillation of academic theory to practical evaluation tool.

KW - educational games

KW - evaluation

KW - expert evaluation

KW - games based learning

KW - serious games

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-23766-4_58

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-23766-4_58

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9783319237657

VL - 535

SP - 734

EP - 747

BT - Communications in Computer and Information Science

PB - Springer Verlag

ER -