Rape victims' experiences of giving evidence in English criminal courts: a survey

Mark R. Kebbell, Caitriona M. O'Kelly, Elizabeth Gilchrist

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Nineteen rape victims who had given evidence in court in English courts were interviewed. Questions concerned their examination in court, their perceptions of the criminal justice system, particularly criminal court processes, and the perceived utility of 'special measures' to facilitate giving evidence. Participants believed that prosecution lawyers generally did not accuse them of lying, attack what they said, put their character in doubt, put words in their mouth or use trick or leading questions. Defence lawyers were perceived to be significantly more likely to use these techniques. Participants reported that they felt they understood what was going on and, importantly, felt that they were reasonably able to give accurate evidence. They generally showed high levels of satisfaction with the way they had been treated, and positive attitudes towards measures to make giving evidence less stressful.

Original languageEnglish
JournalPsychiatry, Psychology and Law
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2007

Fingerprint

Lawyers
Rape
rape
Criminal Law
lawyer
evidence
Mouth
experience
prosecution
justice
examination
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • criminal justice system
  • forensic psychology

Cite this

Kebbell, Mark R. ; O'Kelly, Caitriona M. ; Gilchrist, Elizabeth. / Rape victims' experiences of giving evidence in English criminal courts: a survey. In: Psychiatry, Psychology and Law. 2007.
@article{c6ef1043622a43d78d629426041d17e0,
title = "Rape victims' experiences of giving evidence in English criminal courts: a survey",
abstract = "Nineteen rape victims who had given evidence in court in English courts were interviewed. Questions concerned their examination in court, their perceptions of the criminal justice system, particularly criminal court processes, and the perceived utility of 'special measures' to facilitate giving evidence. Participants believed that prosecution lawyers generally did not accuse them of lying, attack what they said, put their character in doubt, put words in their mouth or use trick or leading questions. Defence lawyers were perceived to be significantly more likely to use these techniques. Participants reported that they felt they understood what was going on and, importantly, felt that they were reasonably able to give accurate evidence. They generally showed high levels of satisfaction with the way they had been treated, and positive attitudes towards measures to make giving evidence less stressful.",
keywords = "criminal justice system, forensic psychology",
author = "Kebbell, {Mark R.} and O'Kelly, {Caitriona M.} and Elizabeth Gilchrist",
note = "Originally published in: Psychiatry, Psychology and Law (2007), 14 (1), pp.111-119.",
year = "2007",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1375/pplt.14.1.111",
language = "English",
journal = "Psychiatry, Psychology and Law",
issn = "1321-8719",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis Group",

}

Rape victims' experiences of giving evidence in English criminal courts: a survey. / Kebbell, Mark R.; O'Kelly, Caitriona M.; Gilchrist, Elizabeth.

In: Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 01.04.2007.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rape victims' experiences of giving evidence in English criminal courts: a survey

AU - Kebbell, Mark R.

AU - O'Kelly, Caitriona M.

AU - Gilchrist, Elizabeth

N1 - Originally published in: Psychiatry, Psychology and Law (2007), 14 (1), pp.111-119.

PY - 2007/4/1

Y1 - 2007/4/1

N2 - Nineteen rape victims who had given evidence in court in English courts were interviewed. Questions concerned their examination in court, their perceptions of the criminal justice system, particularly criminal court processes, and the perceived utility of 'special measures' to facilitate giving evidence. Participants believed that prosecution lawyers generally did not accuse them of lying, attack what they said, put their character in doubt, put words in their mouth or use trick or leading questions. Defence lawyers were perceived to be significantly more likely to use these techniques. Participants reported that they felt they understood what was going on and, importantly, felt that they were reasonably able to give accurate evidence. They generally showed high levels of satisfaction with the way they had been treated, and positive attitudes towards measures to make giving evidence less stressful.

AB - Nineteen rape victims who had given evidence in court in English courts were interviewed. Questions concerned their examination in court, their perceptions of the criminal justice system, particularly criminal court processes, and the perceived utility of 'special measures' to facilitate giving evidence. Participants believed that prosecution lawyers generally did not accuse them of lying, attack what they said, put their character in doubt, put words in their mouth or use trick or leading questions. Defence lawyers were perceived to be significantly more likely to use these techniques. Participants reported that they felt they understood what was going on and, importantly, felt that they were reasonably able to give accurate evidence. They generally showed high levels of satisfaction with the way they had been treated, and positive attitudes towards measures to make giving evidence less stressful.

KW - criminal justice system

KW - forensic psychology

U2 - 10.1375/pplt.14.1.111

DO - 10.1375/pplt.14.1.111

M3 - Article

JO - Psychiatry, Psychology and Law

JF - Psychiatry, Psychology and Law

SN - 1321-8719

ER -