Priority setting in a Canadian long-term care setting: a case study using program budgeting and marginal analysis

Craig Mitton*, Cam Donaldson, Pat Manderville

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Canadian health regions are required to set priorities and allocate resources within a limited funding envelope. Program budgeting and marginal analysis (PBMA) was piloted in continuing care in Claresholm, Alberta, with the aim of improving overall benefit from available resources. A marginal-analysis expert panel was used to assess options for continuing-care delivery. Inputs into the decision-making process included evidence from the literature, regional and provincial reports, program budgeting information, and local knowledge. Recommendations included implementing adult, day-and-night support programs and converting long-term beds to convalescent beds. Changes were funded through allocating provincial Broda funding and altering nursing assistant and physiotherapy activity. PBMA was demonstrated to be an effective framework in aiding decision makers with redesigning services in Claresholm. This case study is one of several which indicate PBMA to be a valuable aid to priority setting in health care service provision.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)311-321
Number of pages11
JournalCanadian Journal on Aging
Volume22
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2003

Keywords

  • aging
  • continuing care
  • long-term care
  • priority setting

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Gerontology
  • Community and Home Care
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Priority setting in a Canadian long-term care setting: a case study using program budgeting and marginal analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this