TY - JOUR
T1 - Principles for responsible management education in 2068
AU - Huntley Henderson, Lionel
AU - Wersun, Alec
AU - Wilson, John
AU - Yeung, Shirley Mo-ching
AU - Zhang, Kejing
N1 - Published following presentation of working paper at the 8th PRME Asia Forum: Sustainable Futures, Partnering in Responsible Management Education
Acceptance from webpage
AAM: 24m embargo
PY - 2019/8
Y1 - 2019/8
N2 - The authors explore the potential relevance of the United Nations initiative Principles for Responsible Management Education (PRME) in 50 years’ time, including whether, and how, the six Principles on which it is based will change inany way. More than 10 years’ after the launch of PRME, the need to address sustainability in management education is perhaps becoming even more acute, in part due to indirect and contextual issues, including those relating to theenvironment and geopolitics, and in part due to more direct factors, such as the trends in artificial intelligence. In this context, the authors consider whether PRME might still exist in 2068 and, if so, what it might look like. The research isbased on semi-structured discussions, based on the seven questions approach, involving the authors and participants who were senior managers, academics and students based in PRME signatory higher education institutions in Chinaand/or had academic expertise in the area of corporate social responsibility (CSR). The principal results are the imagined institutional, educational, and occupational changes that may have an impact on the future of PRME. Themain conclusions are an ongoing investigation of the ‘wicked problems’ as identified in the findings.
AB - The authors explore the potential relevance of the United Nations initiative Principles for Responsible Management Education (PRME) in 50 years’ time, including whether, and how, the six Principles on which it is based will change inany way. More than 10 years’ after the launch of PRME, the need to address sustainability in management education is perhaps becoming even more acute, in part due to indirect and contextual issues, including those relating to theenvironment and geopolitics, and in part due to more direct factors, such as the trends in artificial intelligence. In this context, the authors consider whether PRME might still exist in 2068 and, if so, what it might look like. The research isbased on semi-structured discussions, based on the seven questions approach, involving the authors and participants who were senior managers, academics and students based in PRME signatory higher education institutions in Chinaand/or had academic expertise in the area of corporate social responsibility (CSR). The principal results are the imagined institutional, educational, and occupational changes that may have an impact on the future of PRME. Themain conclusions are an ongoing investigation of the ‘wicked problems’ as identified in the findings.
KW - futures studies
KW - strategic conversations
KW - PRME
KW - management education
KW - sustainability
KW - corporate social responsibility
U2 - 10.1016/j.futures.2019.05.005
DO - 10.1016/j.futures.2019.05.005
M3 - Article
SN - 0016-3287
VL - 111
SP - 81
EP - 89
JO - FUTURES: The Journal of Policy, Planning and Future Studies
JF - FUTURES: The Journal of Policy, Planning and Future Studies
ER -