TY - JOUR
T1 - Pressure drop: securitising and de-securitising safeguarding
AU - McKendrick, David
AU - Finch, Jo
N1 - Acceptance in SAN
- NYP 13/3/20 DC
Replaced AAM with VoR. ET 28/4/20
-- https://anzswjournal.nz/anzsw/about/submissions#copyrightNotice
This is an OA journal and this article available under CC-BY (not mentioned on VoR but on the webpage). ET 28/4/20
Journal OA policy:
https://anzswjournal.nz/anzsw/about/editorialPolicies#openAccessPolicy
PY - 2020/4/14
Y1 - 2020/4/14
N2 - This article explores how securitization theory is mobilised in contemporary social work discourse, policy and practice. We draw on recent child protection research to support our claim that a new practice issue, described previously as securitised safeguarding, has emerged. We demonstrate its emergence using securitization theory as a conceptual mode of analysis to describe how a securitised safeguarding response depicts particular families as an existential threat, which in turn, prompts a response characterised by forms of muscular liberalism. We argue that this emerging practice issue requires critical consideration and suggest it will have a significant impact on social work; one that is unlikely to be beneficial for the profession and more importantly, families being worked with. By describing a process of de-securitisation, we offer an alternative and more nuanced approach, that perceives families holistically, and mobilises a welfare safeguarding model. This more closely resembles traditional social work values of emancipation, liberation and empowerment within social work practice.
AB - This article explores how securitization theory is mobilised in contemporary social work discourse, policy and practice. We draw on recent child protection research to support our claim that a new practice issue, described previously as securitised safeguarding, has emerged. We demonstrate its emergence using securitization theory as a conceptual mode of analysis to describe how a securitised safeguarding response depicts particular families as an existential threat, which in turn, prompts a response characterised by forms of muscular liberalism. We argue that this emerging practice issue requires critical consideration and suggest it will have a significant impact on social work; one that is unlikely to be beneficial for the profession and more importantly, families being worked with. By describing a process of de-securitisation, we offer an alternative and more nuanced approach, that perceives families holistically, and mobilises a welfare safeguarding model. This more closely resembles traditional social work values of emancipation, liberation and empowerment within social work practice.
KW - social work policy
KW - securitisation
KW - safeguarding
UR - https://anzswjournal.nz/anzsw/article/view/706/682
M3 - Article
SN - 2463-4131
VL - 32
SP - 61
EP - 72
JO - Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work
JF - Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work
IS - 1
ER -