Abstract
A comparison is made between two vehicle control strategies for two different manoeuvres: a gentle and aggressive lane-change. Simulation results demonstrate that the choice of control objectives and selection of appropriate design approximations have a significant impact on the performance of the controller under these different manoeuvre conditions. A lateral control design trade-off between passenger comfort and collision avoidance capability is evident.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Proceeding of the 2007 IEEE Intelligent Vehicle Symposium |
| Publisher | IEEE |
| Pages | 468-473 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Volume | IV |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 1-4244-1068-1 |
| ISBN (Print) | 1-4244-1067-3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2007 |
Publication series
| Name | Proceeding of the 2007 IEEE Intelligent Vehicle Symposium |
|---|---|
| Publisher | IEEE |
| ISSN (Print) | 1931-0587 |
Keywords
- collision avoidance
- control system synthesis
- vehicle dynamics
- automatic control
- control systems
- sliding mode control
- velocity control
- linear feedback control systems
- tires
- stability
- automotive engineering
Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Performance comparison of collision avoidance controller designs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Cite this
Bevan, G. P., O'Neill, S. J., Gollee, H., & O'Reilly, J. (2007). Performance comparison of collision avoidance controller designs. In Proceeding of the 2007 IEEE Intelligent Vehicle Symposium (Vol. IV, pp. 468-473). (Proceeding of the 2007 IEEE Intelligent Vehicle Symposium). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IVS.2007.4290159