Patient and public involvement in an evidence synthesis project: description of and reflection on involvement

Katie Thomson*, Alex Todhunter-Brown, Marian C. Brady, Pauline Campbell, Liam Doris, Susan M. Hunter, Donald J. Nicolson, Christine Hazelton

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: We conducted an NIHR-funded evidence synthesis project, reviewing evidence relating to interventions for perceptual disorders following stroke. This related paper describes how people with lived experience of stroke-related perceptual disorders contributed to and influenced the project, and identifies lessons for future review projects.
Methods: We planned our patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) activities within a study protocol, described according to the domains of the ACTIVE framework; these were founded on principles for good practice in PPIE. Activities occurred across the lifespan of the project, consisting primarily of group discussions and voting to determine if there was consensus. To assess impact and individual experiences, we sought feedback using an evaluation form after each discussion, and conducted an online meeting at the end of the project to allow further reflection.
Results: We recruited five people to a Lived Experience Group, including two stroke survivors and three carers. Members attended one face-to-face meeting during the development of the review. Subsequent activities were all held online due to the COVID-19 pandemic; with six online meetings, plus email interactions. Positive impacts of the Lived Experience Group on the reviews included clear definitions of key terms, selection of outcome measures, agreement on implications of review findings, and identification of research recommendations. Key challenges identified related to the complexity of the topic and challenges in the use of new online technology as a consequence of the COVID-pandemic. Conclusions: A number of lessons were learned during this project. Specific recommendations for future PPIE are to ensure that those involved have an opportunity to get to know one another, and to provide optional sessions to increase familiarity with online meeting software, clear explanations of the purpose of involvement and specific feedback after each activity. These lessons should be considered when planning the PPIE within future reviews.
Original languageEnglish
Article number102
Number of pages11
JournalResearch Involvement and Engagement
Volume10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Oct 2024

Keywords

  • PPI
  • Consumer
  • Involvement
  • Impact
  • Challenges
  • Evidence synthesis
  • Stroke
  • Perception

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • General Health Professions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Patient and public involvement in an evidence synthesis project: description of and reflection on involvement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this