On the energy-delay tradeoff and relay positioning of wireless butterfly networks

Quoc-Tuan Vien, Huan Nguyen, Brian Stewart, Jinho Choi, Wanqing Tu

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    This paper considers energy-delay tradeoff (EDT) of data transmission in wireless-network-coded butterfly networks (WNCBNs) where two sources convey their data to two destinations with the assistance of a relay employing either physical-layer network coding (PNC) or analog network coding (ANC). Hybrid automatic repeat request with incremental redundancy (HARQ-IR) is applied for reliable communication. In particular, we first investigate the EDT of both PNC and ANC schemes in WNCBNs to evaluate their energy efficiency. It is found that there is no advantage to using a relay in a high-power regime. However, in a low-power regime, the PNC scheme is shown to be more energy efficient than both the ANC and direct transmission (DT) schemes if the relay is located far from the sources, whereas both the PNC and ANC schemes are less energy efficient than the DT scheme when the relay is located near the sources. Additionally, algorithms that optimize relay positioning (RP) are developed based on two criteria: minimizing total transmission delays and minimizing total energy consumption subject to node location and power allocation constraints. This optimization can be considered a benchmark for RP in either a low-latency or low-energy-consumption WNCBN.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)159-172
    Number of pages14
    JournalIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology
    Volume64
    Issue number1
    Early online date30 Apr 2014
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jan 2015

    Keywords

    • Hybrid automatic repeat request with incremental redundancy (HARQ-IR)
    • network coding (NC)
    • wireless butterfly network

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'On the energy-delay tradeoff and relay positioning of wireless butterfly networks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this