Myopia and defocus: the current understanding

Mhairi Day, Lorraine Duffy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

73 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The current theories relating to the development and progression of myopia are related to exposure of the eye to hyperopic defocus. This paper discusses these theories and the large body of recent research investigating the evidence behind them. As both human and animal studies demonstrate, when considering the potential influence of defocus on eye growth, the duration of exposure as well as the type and magnitude of the blur are important. In addition, we must understand the defocus threshold over which an eye growth signal can be made. Investigations with respect to central defocus alone have been unable to find a unified theory due to (1) insufficient evidence showing refractive group differences in the amount of central defocus actually present and (2) unsuccessful attempts to wholely reduce myopia progression using corrective lenses. Recent research measuring peripheral blur is summarised in this paper and modelled together with previous measurements of peripheral defocus thresholds, providing an up-to-date perspective on myopia.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-14
Number of pages14
JournalScandinavian Journal of Optometry and Visual Science
Volume4
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2011

Fingerprint

myopia
progressions
thresholds
animals
lenses

Keywords

  • myope
  • emmetrope
  • defocus
  • accommodation
  • periphery
  • vision sciences

Cite this

Day, M., & Duffy, L. (2011). Myopia and defocus: the current understanding. Scandinavian Journal of Optometry and Visual Science, 4(1), 1-14.
Day, Mhairi ; Duffy, Lorraine. / Myopia and defocus: the current understanding. In: Scandinavian Journal of Optometry and Visual Science. 2011 ; Vol. 4, No. 1. pp. 1-14.
@article{98c61de7d9c349179395df7795745027,
title = "Myopia and defocus: the current understanding",
abstract = "The current theories relating to the development and progression of myopia are related to exposure of the eye to hyperopic defocus. This paper discusses these theories and the large body of recent research investigating the evidence behind them. As both human and animal studies demonstrate, when considering the potential influence of defocus on eye growth, the duration of exposure as well as the type and magnitude of the blur are important. In addition, we must understand the defocus threshold over which an eye growth signal can be made. Investigations with respect to central defocus alone have been unable to find a unified theory due to (1) insufficient evidence showing refractive group differences in the amount of central defocus actually present and (2) unsuccessful attempts to wholely reduce myopia progression using corrective lenses. Recent research measuring peripheral blur is summarised in this paper and modelled together with previous measurements of peripheral defocus thresholds, providing an up-to-date perspective on myopia.",
keywords = "myope, emmetrope, defocus, accommodation, periphery, vision sciences",
author = "Mhairi Day and Lorraine Duffy",
year = "2011",
month = "6",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "1--14",
number = "1",

}

Day, M & Duffy, L 2011, 'Myopia and defocus: the current understanding', Scandinavian Journal of Optometry and Visual Science, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1-14.

Myopia and defocus: the current understanding. / Day, Mhairi; Duffy, Lorraine.

In: Scandinavian Journal of Optometry and Visual Science, Vol. 4, No. 1, 06.2011, p. 1-14.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Myopia and defocus: the current understanding

AU - Day, Mhairi

AU - Duffy, Lorraine

PY - 2011/6

Y1 - 2011/6

N2 - The current theories relating to the development and progression of myopia are related to exposure of the eye to hyperopic defocus. This paper discusses these theories and the large body of recent research investigating the evidence behind them. As both human and animal studies demonstrate, when considering the potential influence of defocus on eye growth, the duration of exposure as well as the type and magnitude of the blur are important. In addition, we must understand the defocus threshold over which an eye growth signal can be made. Investigations with respect to central defocus alone have been unable to find a unified theory due to (1) insufficient evidence showing refractive group differences in the amount of central defocus actually present and (2) unsuccessful attempts to wholely reduce myopia progression using corrective lenses. Recent research measuring peripheral blur is summarised in this paper and modelled together with previous measurements of peripheral defocus thresholds, providing an up-to-date perspective on myopia.

AB - The current theories relating to the development and progression of myopia are related to exposure of the eye to hyperopic defocus. This paper discusses these theories and the large body of recent research investigating the evidence behind them. As both human and animal studies demonstrate, when considering the potential influence of defocus on eye growth, the duration of exposure as well as the type and magnitude of the blur are important. In addition, we must understand the defocus threshold over which an eye growth signal can be made. Investigations with respect to central defocus alone have been unable to find a unified theory due to (1) insufficient evidence showing refractive group differences in the amount of central defocus actually present and (2) unsuccessful attempts to wholely reduce myopia progression using corrective lenses. Recent research measuring peripheral blur is summarised in this paper and modelled together with previous measurements of peripheral defocus thresholds, providing an up-to-date perspective on myopia.

KW - myope

KW - emmetrope

KW - defocus

KW - accommodation

KW - periphery

KW - vision sciences

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 1

EP - 14

IS - 1

ER -

Day M, Duffy L. Myopia and defocus: the current understanding. Scandinavian Journal of Optometry and Visual Science. 2011 Jun;4(1):1-14.