More “efficient” justice at the European Court of Human Rights: but at whose expense?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Examines the concern that the changes to the European Court of Human Rights admissibility criteria under the European Convention on Human Rights 1950 Protocol 15, along with other reforms aiming to reduce its caseload, risk undermining the procedural justice afforded to applicants. Considers the possible unintended consequences of the Protocol 15 reform reducing the time limit for lodging a case from six months to four from the date that all domestic remedies have been exhausted.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)206-215
Number of pages10
JournalPublic Law
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2015

Keywords

  • admissibility criteria
  • due process
  • European Court of Human Rights
  • time limits
  • procedural justice

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'More “efficient” justice at the European Court of Human Rights: but at whose expense?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this