Monitoring the public appointments process in the UK

Duncan McTavish, Robert Pyper

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The system for monitoring, regulating and reporting on the way in which UK government ministers make appointments to the boards of public bodies is a relatively neglected area of public management. A decade after the establishment of the Office of the Commissioner for Public Appointments (OCPA), little attention has been paid by academics to the functioning of this agent of accountability (a particularly British device), despite the importance of transparency and accountability for the new public management and modernization. This article seeks to examine the key issues surrounding the Commissioners for Public Appointments as agents of accountability, by examining the tensions in the relationship between OCPA and the executive, variations in the governance arrangements for the Commissioners across the devolved polity and the key findings and recommendations of a number of official reports, while locating these issues in the context of current debates about modernization and 'representativeness' in public bodies.

Original languageEnglish
JournalPublic Management Review
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2007

Fingerprint

Modernization
Monitoring
Transparency
Accountability

Keywords

  • independence
  • accountability
  • public appointments
  • governance

Cite this

@article{65cb56f4b85a466f8158756ebe78fad3,
title = "Monitoring the public appointments process in the UK",
abstract = "The system for monitoring, regulating and reporting on the way in which UK government ministers make appointments to the boards of public bodies is a relatively neglected area of public management. A decade after the establishment of the Office of the Commissioner for Public Appointments (OCPA), little attention has been paid by academics to the functioning of this agent of accountability (a particularly British device), despite the importance of transparency and accountability for the new public management and modernization. This article seeks to examine the key issues surrounding the Commissioners for Public Appointments as agents of accountability, by examining the tensions in the relationship between OCPA and the executive, variations in the governance arrangements for the Commissioners across the devolved polity and the key findings and recommendations of a number of official reports, while locating these issues in the context of current debates about modernization and 'representativeness' in public bodies.",
keywords = "independence, accountability, public appointments, governance",
author = "Duncan McTavish and Robert Pyper",
note = "Originally published in: Public Management Review (2007), 9 (1), pp.145-153.",
year = "2007",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/14719030601181290",
language = "English",
journal = "Public Management Review",
issn = "1471-9037",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",

}

Monitoring the public appointments process in the UK. / McTavish, Duncan; Pyper, Robert.

In: Public Management Review, 01.03.2007.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Monitoring the public appointments process in the UK

AU - McTavish, Duncan

AU - Pyper, Robert

N1 - Originally published in: Public Management Review (2007), 9 (1), pp.145-153.

PY - 2007/3/1

Y1 - 2007/3/1

N2 - The system for monitoring, regulating and reporting on the way in which UK government ministers make appointments to the boards of public bodies is a relatively neglected area of public management. A decade after the establishment of the Office of the Commissioner for Public Appointments (OCPA), little attention has been paid by academics to the functioning of this agent of accountability (a particularly British device), despite the importance of transparency and accountability for the new public management and modernization. This article seeks to examine the key issues surrounding the Commissioners for Public Appointments as agents of accountability, by examining the tensions in the relationship between OCPA and the executive, variations in the governance arrangements for the Commissioners across the devolved polity and the key findings and recommendations of a number of official reports, while locating these issues in the context of current debates about modernization and 'representativeness' in public bodies.

AB - The system for monitoring, regulating and reporting on the way in which UK government ministers make appointments to the boards of public bodies is a relatively neglected area of public management. A decade after the establishment of the Office of the Commissioner for Public Appointments (OCPA), little attention has been paid by academics to the functioning of this agent of accountability (a particularly British device), despite the importance of transparency and accountability for the new public management and modernization. This article seeks to examine the key issues surrounding the Commissioners for Public Appointments as agents of accountability, by examining the tensions in the relationship between OCPA and the executive, variations in the governance arrangements for the Commissioners across the devolved polity and the key findings and recommendations of a number of official reports, while locating these issues in the context of current debates about modernization and 'representativeness' in public bodies.

KW - independence

KW - accountability

KW - public appointments

KW - governance

U2 - 10.1080/14719030601181290

DO - 10.1080/14719030601181290

M3 - Article

JO - Public Management Review

JF - Public Management Review

SN - 1471-9037

ER -