Mobile technologies and learning: expectations, myths and reality

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

M-learning is often approached as an innovative method to teach, but quite often without the proper planning of the actual learning process and proper understanding of the implications on the pedagogy of the learning process in such a setting. Because of the multiple stakeholders in the process – the institution, the learners, the educators, the policy makers, etc. – it is very difficult to encourage educators to engage with something so different that will require a re-think of their teaching practices. In addition, with so many different technical elements and challenges, it is often simply just too daunting a prospect.
It is also unfortunate that m-learning is often only limited to simply mobile access. A good m-pedagogy will not just transfer the learning process to a mobile device, but incorporate the very nature of mobile, flexible, user-guided, bite-sized learning.
A real m-learning needs to have a real purpose and the stakeholders need to see the value in it for it to have a chance to be a success. With all the correct m-pedagogy in place, if the educators and the learners see the value of engaging, m-learning can bring real benefits – flexibility of access and flexibility of engagement – and thus allow a real tailoring of the learning process. It has only been very recently that a real attempt has been made to move to
adaptive learning, incorporating pedagogy and AI (artificial intelligence) methods, and this approach seems to be pointing to a future of real adaptive m-learning.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationHandbook of Mobile Teaching and Learning
EditorsYu (Aimee) Zhang
Place of PublicationBerlin
PublisherSpringer
Pages973-982
Number of pages10
ISBN (Electronic) 9783642541469
ISBN (Print)9783642541452
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 29 Aug 2015

Fingerprint

myth
learning process
learning
educator
flexibility
stakeholder
artificial intelligence
teaching practice
planning
Values

Keywords

  • mobile technologies
  • learning
  • m-learning
  • pedagogy
  • m-pedagogy

Cite this

Petrakieva, L. (2015). Mobile technologies and learning: expectations, myths and reality. In Y. A. Zhang (Ed.), Handbook of Mobile Teaching and Learning (pp. 973-982). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54146-9_28
Petrakieva, Lina. / Mobile technologies and learning: expectations, myths and reality. Handbook of Mobile Teaching and Learning. editor / Yu (Aimee) Zhang. Berlin : Springer, 2015. pp. 973-982
@inbook{7797415ed8534423bb8856d70fcab6be,
title = "Mobile technologies and learning: expectations, myths and reality",
abstract = "M-learning is often approached as an innovative method to teach, but quite often without the proper planning of the actual learning process and proper understanding of the implications on the pedagogy of the learning process in such a setting. Because of the multiple stakeholders in the process – the institution, the learners, the educators, the policy makers, etc. – it is very difficult to encourage educators to engage with something so different that will require a re-think of their teaching practices. In addition, with so many different technical elements and challenges, it is often simply just too daunting a prospect.It is also unfortunate that m-learning is often only limited to simply mobile access. A good m-pedagogy will not just transfer the learning process to a mobile device, but incorporate the very nature of mobile, flexible, user-guided, bite-sized learning.A real m-learning needs to have a real purpose and the stakeholders need to see the value in it for it to have a chance to be a success. With all the correct m-pedagogy in place, if the educators and the learners see the value of engaging, m-learning can bring real benefits – flexibility of access and flexibility of engagement – and thus allow a real tailoring of the learning process. It has only been very recently that a real attempt has been made to move toadaptive learning, incorporating pedagogy and AI (artificial intelligence) methods, and this approach seems to be pointing to a future of real adaptive m-learning.",
keywords = "mobile technologies, learning, m-learning, pedagogy, m-pedagogy",
author = "Lina Petrakieva",
year = "2015",
month = "8",
day = "29",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-642-54146-9_28",
language = "English",
isbn = "9783642541452",
pages = "973--982",
editor = "Zhang, {Yu (Aimee)}",
booktitle = "Handbook of Mobile Teaching and Learning",
publisher = "Springer",

}

Petrakieva, L 2015, Mobile technologies and learning: expectations, myths and reality. in YA Zhang (ed.), Handbook of Mobile Teaching and Learning. Springer, Berlin, pp. 973-982. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54146-9_28

Mobile technologies and learning: expectations, myths and reality. / Petrakieva, Lina.

Handbook of Mobile Teaching and Learning. ed. / Yu (Aimee) Zhang. Berlin : Springer, 2015. p. 973-982.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Mobile technologies and learning: expectations, myths and reality

AU - Petrakieva, Lina

PY - 2015/8/29

Y1 - 2015/8/29

N2 - M-learning is often approached as an innovative method to teach, but quite often without the proper planning of the actual learning process and proper understanding of the implications on the pedagogy of the learning process in such a setting. Because of the multiple stakeholders in the process – the institution, the learners, the educators, the policy makers, etc. – it is very difficult to encourage educators to engage with something so different that will require a re-think of their teaching practices. In addition, with so many different technical elements and challenges, it is often simply just too daunting a prospect.It is also unfortunate that m-learning is often only limited to simply mobile access. A good m-pedagogy will not just transfer the learning process to a mobile device, but incorporate the very nature of mobile, flexible, user-guided, bite-sized learning.A real m-learning needs to have a real purpose and the stakeholders need to see the value in it for it to have a chance to be a success. With all the correct m-pedagogy in place, if the educators and the learners see the value of engaging, m-learning can bring real benefits – flexibility of access and flexibility of engagement – and thus allow a real tailoring of the learning process. It has only been very recently that a real attempt has been made to move toadaptive learning, incorporating pedagogy and AI (artificial intelligence) methods, and this approach seems to be pointing to a future of real adaptive m-learning.

AB - M-learning is often approached as an innovative method to teach, but quite often without the proper planning of the actual learning process and proper understanding of the implications on the pedagogy of the learning process in such a setting. Because of the multiple stakeholders in the process – the institution, the learners, the educators, the policy makers, etc. – it is very difficult to encourage educators to engage with something so different that will require a re-think of their teaching practices. In addition, with so many different technical elements and challenges, it is often simply just too daunting a prospect.It is also unfortunate that m-learning is often only limited to simply mobile access. A good m-pedagogy will not just transfer the learning process to a mobile device, but incorporate the very nature of mobile, flexible, user-guided, bite-sized learning.A real m-learning needs to have a real purpose and the stakeholders need to see the value in it for it to have a chance to be a success. With all the correct m-pedagogy in place, if the educators and the learners see the value of engaging, m-learning can bring real benefits – flexibility of access and flexibility of engagement – and thus allow a real tailoring of the learning process. It has only been very recently that a real attempt has been made to move toadaptive learning, incorporating pedagogy and AI (artificial intelligence) methods, and this approach seems to be pointing to a future of real adaptive m-learning.

KW - mobile technologies

KW - learning

KW - m-learning

KW - pedagogy

KW - m-pedagogy

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-642-54146-9_28

DO - 10.1007/978-3-642-54146-9_28

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9783642541452

SP - 973

EP - 982

BT - Handbook of Mobile Teaching and Learning

A2 - Zhang, Yu (Aimee)

PB - Springer

CY - Berlin

ER -

Petrakieva L. Mobile technologies and learning: expectations, myths and reality. In Zhang YA, editor, Handbook of Mobile Teaching and Learning. Berlin: Springer. 2015. p. 973-982 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54146-9_28