Measuring HIV acquisitions among partners of key populations: estimates from HIV transmission dynamic models

Romain Silhol, Rebecca L. Anderson, Oliver Stevens, James Stannah, Ross D. Booton, Stefan Baral, Dobromir Dimitrov, Kate M. Mitchell, Deborah Donnell, Anna Bershteyn, Tim Brown, Sherrie L. Kelly, Hae-Young Kim, Leigh F. Johnson, Mathieu Maheu-Giroux, Rowan Martin-Hughes, Sharmistha Mishra, Wiwat Peerapatanapokin, Jack Stone, John StoverYu Teng, Peter Vickerman, Sonia Arias Garcia, Eline Korenromp, Jeffrey W. Imai-Eaton, Marie-Claude Boily

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
31 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Key populations (KPs), including female sex workers (FSWs), gay men and other men who have sex with men (MSM), people who inject drugs (PWID), and transgender women (TGW) experience disproportionate risks of HIV acquisition. The UNAIDS Global AIDS 2022 Update reported that one-quarter of all new HIV infections occurred among their non-KP sexual partners. However, this fraction relied on heuristics regarding the ratio of new infections that KPs transmitted to their non-KP partners to the new infections acquired among KPs (herein referred to as "infection ratios"). We recalculated these ratios using dynamic transmission models.

SETTING: One hundred seventy-eight settings (106 countries).

METHODS: Infection ratios for FSW, MSM, PWID, TGW, and clients of FSW were estimated from 12 models for 2020.

RESULTS: Median model estimates of infection ratios were 0.7 (interquartile range: 0.5-1.0; n = 172 estimates) and 1.2 (0.8-1.8; n = 127) for acquisitions from FSW clients and transmissions from FSW to all their non-KP partners, respectively, which were comparable with the previous UNAIDS assumptions (0.2-1.5 across regions). Model estimates for female partners of MSM were 0.5 (0.2-0.8; n = 20) and 0.3 (0.2-0.4; n = 10) for partners of PWID across settings in Eastern and Southern Africa, lower than the corresponding UNAIDS assumptions (0.9 and 0.8, respectively). The few available model estimates for TGW were higher [5.1 (1.2-7.0; n = 8)] than the UNAIDS assumptions (0.1-0.3). Model estimates for non-FSW partners of FSW clients in Western and Central Africa were high (1.7; 1.0-2.3; n = 29).

CONCLUSIONS: Ratios of new infections among non-KP partners relative to KP were high, confirming the importance of better addressing prevention and treatment needs among KP as central to reducing overall HIV incidence.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e59-e69
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
Volume95
Issue number1S
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2024
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Male
  • Humans
  • Female
  • HIV Infections/epidemiology
  • Homosexuality, Male
  • Sex Workers
  • Sexual and Gender Minorities
  • Substance Abuse, Intravenous
  • HIV incidence
  • clients of female sex workers
  • men who have sex with men
  • key populations
  • female sex workers
  • people who inject drugs
  • transgender women

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Infectious Diseases
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Measuring HIV acquisitions among partners of key populations: estimates from HIV transmission dynamic models'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this