Limitations of recreational camera traps for wildlife management and conservation research: a practitioner's perspective

Scott Newey, Paul Davidson, Sajid Nazir, Gorry Fairhurst, Fabio Verdicchio, R. Justin Irvine, René van der Wal

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    The availability of affordable 'recreational' camera traps has dramatically increased over the last decade. We present survey results which show that many conservation practitioners use cheaper 'recreational' units for research rather than more expensive 'professional' equipment. We present our perspective of using two popular models of 'recreational' camera trap for ecological field-based studies. The models used (for >2 years) presented us with a range of practical problems at all stages of their use including deployment, operation, and data management, which collectively crippled data collection and limited opportunities for quantification of key issues arising. Our experiences demonstrate that prospective users need to have a sufficient understanding of the limitations camera trap technology poses, dimensions we communicate here. While the merits of different camera traps will be study specific, the performance of more expensive 'professional' models may prove more cost-effective in the long-term when using camera traps for research.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)624-635
    Number of pages12
    JournalAMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment
    Volume44
    Issue number4
    Early online date27 Oct 2015
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Nov 2015

    Keywords

    • camera trap
    • digital innovation
    • false negative
    • false positive
    • sensors
    • trail camera
    • wildlife management
    • wildlife conservation

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Limitations of recreational camera traps for wildlife management and conservation research: a practitioner's perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this