Let’s call it “aphasia”: rationales for eliminating the term “dysphasia”

L. Worrall, N. Simmons-Mackie, S.J. Wallace, T. Rose, M.C. Brady, A.P.H. Kong, L. Murray, B. Hallowell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Health professionals, researchers, and policy makers often consider the two terms aphasia and dysphasia to be synonymous. The aim of this article is to argue the merits of the exclusive use of the term aphasia and present a
strategy for creating change through institutions such as the WHO-ICD. Our contention is that one term avoids confusion, speech-language pathologists prefer aphasia, scholarly publications indicate a preference for the term aphasia,
stroke clinical guidelines indicate a preference for the term aphasia, consumer organizations use the title aphasia in their name and on their websites, and languages other than English use a term similar to aphasia. The use of the term dysphasia in the broader medical community may stem from the two terms being used interchangeably in the ICD10. Aphasia United http://www.shrs.uq.edu.au/aphasiaunited, an international movement for uniting the voice of all stakeholders in aphasia within an international context, will seek to eliminate the use of the term dysphasia.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)848-851
Number of pages4
JournalInternational Journal of Stroke
Volume11
Issue number8
Early online date6 Jul 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2016

Fingerprint

Aphasia
Consumer Organizations
Language
Confusion
Administrative Personnel
Names
Publications
Stroke
Research Personnel
Guidelines

Keywords

  • aphasia
  • dysphasia

Cite this

Worrall, L., Simmons-Mackie, N., Wallace, S. J., Rose, T., Brady, M. C., Kong, A. P. H., ... Hallowell , B. (2016). Let’s call it “aphasia”: rationales for eliminating the term “dysphasia”. International Journal of Stroke, 11(8), 848-851. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747493016654487
Worrall, L. ; Simmons-Mackie, N. ; Wallace, S.J. ; Rose, T. ; Brady, M.C. ; Kong, A.P.H. ; Murray, L. ; Hallowell , B. / Let’s call it “aphasia”: rationales for eliminating the term “dysphasia”. In: International Journal of Stroke. 2016 ; Vol. 11, No. 8. pp. 848-851.
@article{85d753e10343445484119e2a712c1eb5,
title = "Let’s call it “aphasia”: rationales for eliminating the term “dysphasia”",
abstract = "Health professionals, researchers, and policy makers often consider the two terms aphasia and dysphasia to be synonymous. The aim of this article is to argue the merits of the exclusive use of the term aphasia and present astrategy for creating change through institutions such as the WHO-ICD. Our contention is that one term avoids confusion, speech-language pathologists prefer aphasia, scholarly publications indicate a preference for the term aphasia,stroke clinical guidelines indicate a preference for the term aphasia, consumer organizations use the title aphasia in their name and on their websites, and languages other than English use a term similar to aphasia. The use of the term dysphasia in the broader medical community may stem from the two terms being used interchangeably in the ICD10. Aphasia United http://www.shrs.uq.edu.au/aphasiaunited, an international movement for uniting the voice of all stakeholders in aphasia within an international context, will seek to eliminate the use of the term dysphasia.",
keywords = "aphasia, dysphasia",
author = "L. Worrall and N. Simmons-Mackie and S.J. Wallace and T. Rose and M.C. Brady and A.P.H. Kong and L. Murray and B. Hallowell",
note = "Accepted: 13-4-16 (from VoR attached) Online pub: 6-7-16 AAM: requested x 2 16-12-16 (VoR uploaded) and 9-2-17 Not found in other rep. Applied 'no exception' as file not received after 2 requests. ET 28/10/19",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1177/1747493016654487",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "848--851",
journal = "International Journal of Stroke",
issn = "1747-4930",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "8",

}

Worrall, L, Simmons-Mackie, N, Wallace, SJ, Rose, T, Brady, MC, Kong, APH, Murray, L & Hallowell , B 2016, 'Let’s call it “aphasia”: rationales for eliminating the term “dysphasia”', International Journal of Stroke, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 848-851. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747493016654487

Let’s call it “aphasia”: rationales for eliminating the term “dysphasia”. / Worrall, L.; Simmons-Mackie, N.; Wallace, S.J.; Rose, T.; Brady, M.C.; Kong, A.P.H.; Murray, L.; Hallowell , B.

In: International Journal of Stroke, Vol. 11, No. 8, 10.2016, p. 848-851.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Let’s call it “aphasia”: rationales for eliminating the term “dysphasia”

AU - Worrall, L.

AU - Simmons-Mackie, N.

AU - Wallace, S.J.

AU - Rose, T.

AU - Brady, M.C.

AU - Kong, A.P.H.

AU - Murray, L.

AU - Hallowell , B.

N1 - Accepted: 13-4-16 (from VoR attached) Online pub: 6-7-16 AAM: requested x 2 16-12-16 (VoR uploaded) and 9-2-17 Not found in other rep. Applied 'no exception' as file not received after 2 requests. ET 28/10/19

PY - 2016/10

Y1 - 2016/10

N2 - Health professionals, researchers, and policy makers often consider the two terms aphasia and dysphasia to be synonymous. The aim of this article is to argue the merits of the exclusive use of the term aphasia and present astrategy for creating change through institutions such as the WHO-ICD. Our contention is that one term avoids confusion, speech-language pathologists prefer aphasia, scholarly publications indicate a preference for the term aphasia,stroke clinical guidelines indicate a preference for the term aphasia, consumer organizations use the title aphasia in their name and on their websites, and languages other than English use a term similar to aphasia. The use of the term dysphasia in the broader medical community may stem from the two terms being used interchangeably in the ICD10. Aphasia United http://www.shrs.uq.edu.au/aphasiaunited, an international movement for uniting the voice of all stakeholders in aphasia within an international context, will seek to eliminate the use of the term dysphasia.

AB - Health professionals, researchers, and policy makers often consider the two terms aphasia and dysphasia to be synonymous. The aim of this article is to argue the merits of the exclusive use of the term aphasia and present astrategy for creating change through institutions such as the WHO-ICD. Our contention is that one term avoids confusion, speech-language pathologists prefer aphasia, scholarly publications indicate a preference for the term aphasia,stroke clinical guidelines indicate a preference for the term aphasia, consumer organizations use the title aphasia in their name and on their websites, and languages other than English use a term similar to aphasia. The use of the term dysphasia in the broader medical community may stem from the two terms being used interchangeably in the ICD10. Aphasia United http://www.shrs.uq.edu.au/aphasiaunited, an international movement for uniting the voice of all stakeholders in aphasia within an international context, will seek to eliminate the use of the term dysphasia.

KW - aphasia

KW - dysphasia

U2 - 10.1177/1747493016654487

DO - 10.1177/1747493016654487

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 848

EP - 851

JO - International Journal of Stroke

JF - International Journal of Stroke

SN - 1747-4930

IS - 8

ER -