Legislation on smoking in enclosed public places in Scotland: how will we evaluate the impact?

Sally J. Haw, Laurence Gruer, Amanda Amos, Candace Currie, Colin Fishbacher, Geoffrey T. Fong, Gerard Hastings, Sally Malam, Jill Pell, Calum Scott, Sean Semple

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

45 Citations (Scopus)


Background: From 26 March 2006, smoking will be prohibited in wholly and substantially enclosed public places in Scotland, and it will be an offence to permit smoking or to smoke in no-smoking premises. We anticipate that implementation of the smoke-free legislation will result in significant health gains associated with reductions in exposure to both environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) and personal tobacco consumption as well as other social and economic impacts.

Methods: Health Scotland in conjunction with the Information Services Division (ISD) Scotland and the Scottish Executive have developed a comprehensive evaluation strategy to assess the expected short-term, intermediate and long-term outcomes. Using routine health, behavioural and economic data and commissioned research, we will assess the impact of the smoke-free legislation in eight key outcome areas - knowledge and attitudes, ETS exposure, compliance, culture, smoking prevalence and tobacco consumption, tobacco-related morbidity and mortality, economic impacts on the hospitality sector and health inequalities.

Conclusion: The findings from this evaluation will make a significant contribution to the international understanding of the health effects of exposure to ETS and the broader social, cultural and economic impacts of smoke-free legislation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)24-30
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Public Health
Issue number1
Early online date17 Feb 2006
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2006


  • air pollution
  • public health
  • respiratory health
  • secondhand smoke
  • tobacco


Dive into the research topics of 'Legislation on smoking in enclosed public places in Scotland: how will we evaluate the impact?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this