Interventions for improving sit-to-stand ability following stroke

Keyphrases

• Sit-to-stand 100%
• June 2013 16%
• Confidence Interval 12%
• Intervention Effect 9%
• Functional Capacity 9%
• Risk of Bias 9%
• Vertical Ground Reaction Force 9%
• Lateral Symmetry 9%
• High Risk 6%
• Absence of Evidence 6%
• Rehabilitation Interventions 6%
• Task-oriented Training 6%
• Odds Ratio 6%
• Standardized Mean Difference 6%
• Fall Incidence 6%
• Weight Distribution 6%
• Meta-analysis 3%
• CINAHL 3%
• MEDLINE 3%
• Embase 3%
• Randomized Controlled Trial 3%
• Stroke Patients 3%
• Randomized Trial 3%
• Cochrane 3%
• Inclusion Criteria 3%
• Beneficial Effects 3%
• Center of Pressure 3%
• Repetitive Task 3%
• People with Stroke 3%
• Extracted Data 3%
• AMED 3%
• Exercise Program 3%
• Methodological Quality 3%
• Preventing Falls 3%
• Intervention Effectiveness 3%
• Ability Score 3%
• Review Authors 3%
• Search Methods 3%
• Sit-to-walk 3%
• Evidence of Effectiveness 3%
• Missing Data 3%
• Selection Criteria 3%
• Standing up 3%
• Low Risk 3%
• Foot Position 3%
• Repetitive Exercise 3%
• Repeated Practice 3%
• Generation Allocation 3%
• Seating Position 3%
• Independent Living 3%
• Repetitive Practice 3%
• Chair Height 3%
• Issue 5 3%
• Functional Tasks 3%
• Random number Generation 3%
• Lateral Movement 3%
• Allocation Concealment 3%

Medicine and Dentistry

• Apoplexy 100%
• Activities of Daily Living 42%
• Body Position 42%
• Odds Ratio 28%
• Randomized Controlled Trial 14%
• Meta-Analysis 14%
• Leg 14%
• Methapyrilene 14%
• Independent Living 14%
• Group Trial 14%

Nursing and Health Professions

• Cerebrovascular Accident 100%
• Confidence Interval 57%
• Odds Ratio 28%
• CINAHL 14%
• Meta Analysis 14%
• Methapyrilene 14%