Interrogative suggestibility: the role of interviewer behaviour

Stella Anne Bain, James S. Baxter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: Interrogative suggestibility may vary as a function of interviewer behaviour. The present study assessed the effect of two interviewer styles on measures of interrogative suggestibility obtained using the first of the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scales (GSS1). It was hypothesized that a generally abrupt demeanour adopted by the interviewer would produce greater psychological distance, and therefore higher GSS1 scores, than a friendly demeanour.
Methods: The study had a single factor between participants design. Participants were tested on the GSS1 by an interviewer whose behaviour was either ‘friendly’ or ‘abrupt’. One female experimenter conducted all of the interviews. Fifty-five participants took part in the study. Most participants were first year undergraduate psychology students. Others were university administrative staff. Results. Two of the GSS1 measures appeared to be biased significantly by interviewer style. Participants tested in the ‘abrupt’ condition gained higher scores for Shift and Total Suggestibility than those in the ‘friendly’ condition.
Conclusions: These results are consistent with the view that the GSS1 provides measures of two different types of suggestibility. However, this finding may also mean that whilst initial responses to leading questions are mediated by more stable cognitive factors that are relatively unaffected by interviewer demeanour, post-feedback scores may be more sensitive to the social aspects of suggestibility. Implications of the results for the objectivity and administration of the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scales are discussed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)123-133
Number of pages11
JournalLegal and Criminological Psychology
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2000

Fingerprint

Interviews
Epidemiologic Effect Modifiers
Psychology
Students

Keywords

  • Gudjonsson suggestibility scales
  • interview techniques
  • suggestibility
  • criminal psychology

Cite this

Bain, S. A., & Baxter, J. S. (2000). Interrogative suggestibility: the role of interviewer behaviour. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 5(1), 123-133. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532500168029
Bain, Stella Anne ; Baxter, James S. / Interrogative suggestibility: the role of interviewer behaviour. In: Legal and Criminological Psychology. 2000 ; Vol. 5, No. 1. pp. 123-133.
@article{3e9b2f4e6a374a739db2834cc82fa615,
title = "Interrogative suggestibility: the role of interviewer behaviour",
abstract = "Purpose: Interrogative suggestibility may vary as a function of interviewer behaviour. The present study assessed the effect of two interviewer styles on measures of interrogative suggestibility obtained using the first of the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scales (GSS1). It was hypothesized that a generally abrupt demeanour adopted by the interviewer would produce greater psychological distance, and therefore higher GSS1 scores, than a friendly demeanour. Methods: The study had a single factor between participants design. Participants were tested on the GSS1 by an interviewer whose behaviour was either ‘friendly’ or ‘abrupt’. One female experimenter conducted all of the interviews. Fifty-five participants took part in the study. Most participants were first year undergraduate psychology students. Others were university administrative staff. Results. Two of the GSS1 measures appeared to be biased significantly by interviewer style. Participants tested in the ‘abrupt’ condition gained higher scores for Shift and Total Suggestibility than those in the ‘friendly’ condition. Conclusions: These results are consistent with the view that the GSS1 provides measures of two different types of suggestibility. However, this finding may also mean that whilst initial responses to leading questions are mediated by more stable cognitive factors that are relatively unaffected by interviewer demeanour, post-feedback scores may be more sensitive to the social aspects of suggestibility. Implications of the results for the objectivity and administration of the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scales are discussed.",
keywords = "Gudjonsson suggestibility scales, interview techniques, suggestibility, criminal psychology",
author = "Bain, {Stella Anne} and Baxter, {James S.}",
year = "2000",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1348/135532500168029",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "123--133",
number = "1",

}

Bain, SA & Baxter, JS 2000, 'Interrogative suggestibility: the role of interviewer behaviour', Legal and Criminological Psychology, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 123-133. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532500168029

Interrogative suggestibility: the role of interviewer behaviour. / Bain, Stella Anne; Baxter, James S.

In: Legal and Criminological Psychology, Vol. 5, No. 1, 02.2000, p. 123-133.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interrogative suggestibility: the role of interviewer behaviour

AU - Bain, Stella Anne

AU - Baxter, James S.

PY - 2000/2

Y1 - 2000/2

N2 - Purpose: Interrogative suggestibility may vary as a function of interviewer behaviour. The present study assessed the effect of two interviewer styles on measures of interrogative suggestibility obtained using the first of the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scales (GSS1). It was hypothesized that a generally abrupt demeanour adopted by the interviewer would produce greater psychological distance, and therefore higher GSS1 scores, than a friendly demeanour. Methods: The study had a single factor between participants design. Participants were tested on the GSS1 by an interviewer whose behaviour was either ‘friendly’ or ‘abrupt’. One female experimenter conducted all of the interviews. Fifty-five participants took part in the study. Most participants were first year undergraduate psychology students. Others were university administrative staff. Results. Two of the GSS1 measures appeared to be biased significantly by interviewer style. Participants tested in the ‘abrupt’ condition gained higher scores for Shift and Total Suggestibility than those in the ‘friendly’ condition. Conclusions: These results are consistent with the view that the GSS1 provides measures of two different types of suggestibility. However, this finding may also mean that whilst initial responses to leading questions are mediated by more stable cognitive factors that are relatively unaffected by interviewer demeanour, post-feedback scores may be more sensitive to the social aspects of suggestibility. Implications of the results for the objectivity and administration of the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scales are discussed.

AB - Purpose: Interrogative suggestibility may vary as a function of interviewer behaviour. The present study assessed the effect of two interviewer styles on measures of interrogative suggestibility obtained using the first of the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scales (GSS1). It was hypothesized that a generally abrupt demeanour adopted by the interviewer would produce greater psychological distance, and therefore higher GSS1 scores, than a friendly demeanour. Methods: The study had a single factor between participants design. Participants were tested on the GSS1 by an interviewer whose behaviour was either ‘friendly’ or ‘abrupt’. One female experimenter conducted all of the interviews. Fifty-five participants took part in the study. Most participants were first year undergraduate psychology students. Others were university administrative staff. Results. Two of the GSS1 measures appeared to be biased significantly by interviewer style. Participants tested in the ‘abrupt’ condition gained higher scores for Shift and Total Suggestibility than those in the ‘friendly’ condition. Conclusions: These results are consistent with the view that the GSS1 provides measures of two different types of suggestibility. However, this finding may also mean that whilst initial responses to leading questions are mediated by more stable cognitive factors that are relatively unaffected by interviewer demeanour, post-feedback scores may be more sensitive to the social aspects of suggestibility. Implications of the results for the objectivity and administration of the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scales are discussed.

KW - Gudjonsson suggestibility scales

KW - interview techniques

KW - suggestibility

KW - criminal psychology

U2 - 10.1348/135532500168029

DO - 10.1348/135532500168029

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 123

EP - 133

IS - 1

ER -

Bain SA, Baxter JS. Interrogative suggestibility: the role of interviewer behaviour. Legal and Criminological Psychology. 2000 Feb;5(1):123-133. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532500168029